Campers have left the UC Davis quad after six weeks of protesting the ongoing war in Palestine and the University of California’s investment “in a genocidal Zionist state.” 

Before the decampment, spokespeople from the Davis Popular University for the Liberation of Palestine held a press conference on Wednesday stating the tents and fencing were coming down following “interference” and “obstruction” from the UC Office of the President and the UC Regents.

(12) comments

Oly

Are the protesters going to pay for any damage they have done to the campus?

relentlesscactus

"I wish you - and many others here - would have the honesty and courage to identify yourself as I do"

The name is Alan C. Miller, 45-year resident of Davis, Jew, City Council Clown, the host of Al's Corner on The Davisite, and the only person to publicly commit commenticide on the Davis Vanguard. I had no intention of being an anonymous coward like those who post anonymously or protest with masks on. It's a nickname I use that the computer assigned when I signed up with the Enterprise, and I don't know how one changes it.

"instead of behaving like the so-called "protesters" on campus who believe so much in free speech that they hide their faces to exercice it"

Yeah, agree totally. I despise face-covering cowards. They say it's because they are threatened and have to protect themselves. You know who else are threatened? Jews. And they/we don't hide their faces, because they are not cowards.

And you know who I despise, beyond any coward face-covering protestor in an encampment? Edan On, that 18-year old f*ck who attacked the pro-Palestine camp at UCLA with a wooden pole and white mask. A Jew covering their face and being violent against a protest encampment. What an absolute *@#$%&-face. The degree to which I loath Edan On cannot be stated, and even more the Israeli Nationalist *@#$%&-face parents who raised him and defended him. How did he see his pathetic actions going for him, or for Jewish people overall? He's up there in reasoning with people who shot abortion doctors to protest abortion.

As for the reason I say it isn't a good idea to shut down the protest encampment has nothing to do with how I feel about their demands (which I am baffled to believe Gary May agreed to - recall anyone?), but rather it rarely goes well unless (and even if) there is literal violence perpetrated by the encampment in advance. Camping and blocking a path may be illegal, but we say what happened in 2011 with the Pepper Spraying, and the U totally lost the war on that one, and rightfully so. Now, the *moment* there is violence or threats, the camp should be cleared. From what I could see, this was one of the more peaceful camps in the country.

We should be wary of their own words from this article -- that the movement is going to go "more militant". Definition of militant: "combative and aggressive in support of a political or social cause, and typically favoring extreme, violent, or confrontational methods." I'll take letting them have a peaceful encampment anytime over 'more militant'. Indeed, be wary. They have told us their intentions. Believe them.

J.J. Surbeck

Thank you. Nice to meet you, Alan.

relentlesscactus

I don't know if 'meeting' has occurred considering the circumstances.

BTW, a Google search will reveal the true identities of two of the three other 'anonymous' people who posted here, within a pretty good degree of certainty.

eball8

Thank you for this informative article, Monica. I only recently learned of the meetings the UCD students had with campus administrators and I’m very impressed and proud, both in how our students conducted themselves and how the campus responded. It’s a shame that some of the agreements between students and administrators at UCD could not be formalized into a written agreement because of intervention by the UC Regents and/or UC Office of the President. Thanks for all you do to cover these matters, Monica. Much appreciated!

J.J. Surbeck

This from yet another "anonymous" source who believes so much in free speech that he or she doesn't have the integrity and courage to identify him or herself. As such, does it have any value and does it add anything to the debate? No, it's just more propaganda in favor of lawbreakers.

Daphna Rahmil

Shame shame shame on Monica Stark for writing this clearly biased article and on the Enterprise for publishing it. Do you not have any journalistic standards at all? Quoting only the representatives of a group that wreaked havoc on UCD and the community and repeatedly call for violence?? They might as well have written this ���article” themselves, which sounds more like a propaganda piece than anything else.

relentlesscactus

JJS, I believe the reporter was reporting exactly what they said so we all could judge the legitimacy for themselves, rather than, as you claim, 'bias'. I do not go along with the encampment rhetoric, but I do believe in their right to nonviolently protest. The appear to have mostly done so, especially when compared to many other encampments. Part of this is probably due to the fact the University did not attempt to remove the encampment -- so there was little press on Davis. Even if they broke some rules such as putting up a fence across a walkway and camping on campus, these are better left alone than enforced. The idiots who taunted them only created publicity and gave them fodder to criticize 'Zionists' (as if that were a bad thing)

J.J. Surbeck

Hello "relentlesscactus" (I wish you - and many others here - would have the honesty and courage to identify yourself as I do instead of behaving like the so-called "protesters" on campus who believe so much in free speech that they hide their faces to exercice it). Maybe I am asking for too much, but it seems obvious that anonymous speech hardly qualifies as free speech. Considered from the other end, The Enterprise should not accept anonymous comments, but I digress...

You seem to believe that the most important element in this whole farce is to have maintained "non-violence" on both sides. Let's consider this. What the "protesters" started was NOT non-violent. It was typical bully behavior. They knew they were transgressing the rules but went ahead anyway, daring the administration to do something about it. That's what bullies do. And then of course if their intimidation tactics don't work and they get the forceful response they deserve (which they didn't here), they play martyrs and cry when - as you say - some idiots taunted them. How dare some idiots taunt then when everyone was supposed to take a clue from the administration and let the "protesters" walk all over it with complete impunity? The nerve.

Bullies test how far they can go without suffering the consequences of their actions, and when the strong response they should have received doesn't come, that means they get a green light to push the limits even further, which we will no doubt witness in the fall. From Chamberlain to countless other historical examples, placating bullies has never resulted in getting them to back down, on the contrary (Hitler, Putin and Kim Jong Un are obvious examples).

By refusing to show the spine it is legally entitled and obligated to do and remove the camp as soon as it was set up, the UCD administration bought itself a ticket for far more trouble next year. And as the historical examples mentioned above have proven, violence is far more likely to occur then. Just you watch.

J.J. Surbeck

Sigh... "The Davis Popular University for the Liberation of Palestine?" What on earth is that? Apparently it's a student-driven invention, never officially registered as a bona fide UC Davis student group, and yet it is presented by this terminally biased pseudo journalist as legitimate? In that case, can we have a "Davis Popular University for the Liberation of Ukraine" please? How about the liberation of Tibet? The liberation of the Western Sahara? The liberation of Northern Cyprus? No? Why? The singular myopia of this idiotic motley crew obsessed exclusively with Israel defending itself against Hamas terrorism disqualifies them from giving lessons to anyone about "saving even one Palestinian life". What a sad joke they are.

And as usual, no one there has uttered a single word of regret or admission of wrongdoing in the atrocities committed by Hamas on October 7. The rapes, the murders, the torture, the burning of families and children alive, the mutilations of bodies that could not even be identified as a result, and of course the kidnapping of more than 200 people of all ages, none of these abominable exactions seem to have happened. A minimum of honesty in admitting that these actions - all of them defined war crimes - were what triggered the current Gaza war (the fifth started by Hamas in less than 20 years) would have lent the "protesters" some degree of credibility. Instead, their obtuse one-sidedness only serves to underline their irrelevance. They feel so good about themselves for having stood their ground in Davis when in fact they have accomplished absolutely nothing. How pathetic.

Or maybe not as pathetic as the meek responses from the administration, obsessed with placating these pseudo-protesters, sending one delegation after another to "discuss" with their leaders in order to "de-escalate" instead of removing them immediately, forcibly if necessary, since they broke the rules this college is supposed to follow. This will result in only one outcome: get ready for more of the same nonsense in the fall. You have been warned.

DavisMillenial

Now that finals are over and summer begins, and the student body audience is gone, the protest is over and participants show the fundamental inauthenticity of this event. This was actually students looking for an excuse to skip class than actually be committed to their cause. The situation in Gaza and Israel get worse everyday, and now on the eve of invading Lebanon, the protest is over and they won? Biden is getting humiliated by Netanyahu complaining that Santa didn’t get to his house fast enough. How is that a win for the protesters? This is very bizarre behavior

relentlesscactus

The use the word Zionist as if that were a bad thing :-| I do salute the use of nonviolent tactics by the encampment. Would be interesting to know what they mean when they say the movement will get 'more militant'.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.