Lonely places or lonely people? Investigating the relationship between loneliness and place of residence
- PMID: 32456626
- PMCID: PMC7251825
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08703-8
Lonely places or lonely people? Investigating the relationship between loneliness and place of residence
Abstract
Background: Loneliness in later life is largely presented as a problem of the individual focusing upon antecedents such as demographic or health factors. Research examining the role of the broader living environments is much rarer. We examined the relationship between loneliness and three dimensions of the lived environment: geographical region, deprivation, and area classification (urban or rural).
Methods: Our sample consisted of 4663 core members (44% males) aged 50+ (wave 7 mean age 72.8, S.D. = 7.1) present both in waves 3 (2006) and 7 (2014) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Loneliness was measured using two approaches, individual and area-based, and both waves included these questions. Individual-based (self-reported) loneliness was assessed using the three item University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale (ranging from 3 = not lonely to 9 = lonely) with a score of 6+ defining loneliness. We also used a novel question which asked participants to evaluate how often they felt lonely in their area of residence (area-based; ranging from 1 = often to 7 = never, using cut off 4+ to define loneliness). The lived environment was classified in three different ways: the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), Government Office Regions (GOR), and area classification (urban or rural). Covariates with established relationship with loneliness including demographic factors, social engagement and health, were included in the analyses.
Results: In wave 7, the prevalence of individual-based loneliness was 18% and area-based was 25%. There was limited congruence between measures: 68% participants reported no individual- or area-based loneliness and 9% reported loneliness for both measures. After adjusting for individual co-variates only one significant relationship was observed between loneliness and area -based characteristics. A significant association was observed between area-based loneliness and deprivation score, with higher levels of loneliness in more deprived areas (OR = 1.4 for highest quintile of deprivation).
Conclusions: Our results indicate that loneliness in older adults is higher in the most deprived areas independent of individual-level factors. In order to develop appropriate interventions further research is required to investigate how area-level factors combine with individual-level loneliness vulnerability measures to generate increased levels of loneliness in deprived areas.
Keywords: Area; Deprivation; English Longitudinal Study of Ageing; Loneliness; Rural; Urban.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Longitudinal analysis of loneliness and inflammation at older ages: English longitudinal study of ageing.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Dec;110:104421. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104421. Epub 2019 Aug 27. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019. PMID: 31494341
-
Ageing, loneliness, and the geographic distribution of New Zealand's interRAI-HC cohort.Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;227:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 11. Soc Sci Med. 2019. PMID: 30146450
-
Loneliness in middle and old age: demographics, perceived health, and social satisfaction as predictors.Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Nov-Dec;59(3):613-23. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jul 7. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014. PMID: 25109808
-
Correlates and predictors of loneliness in older-adults: a review of quantitative results informed by qualitative insights.Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Apr;28(4):557-76. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001532. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016. PMID: 26424033 Review.
-
Appreciating the 4 "Ts" of Loneliness When Providing Psychiatric Care for the Lonely Patient.J Psychiatr Pract. 2019 Sep;25(5):402-410. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000416. J Psychiatr Pract. 2019. PMID: 31505529 Review.
Cited by
-
The use of technology to address loneliness and social isolation among older adults: the role of social care providers.BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 6;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17386-w. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38184519 Free PMC article.
-
The CLoCk study: A retrospective exploration of loneliness in children and young people during the COVID-19 pandemic, in England.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 21;18(11):e0294165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294165. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37988366 Free PMC article.
-
The Built Environment and Social and Emotional Support among Rural Older Adults: The Case for Social Infrastructure and Attention to Ethnoracial Differences.Rural Sociol. 2023 Sep;88(3):731-762. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12491. Epub 2023 May 19. Rural Sociol. 2023. PMID: 37829666
-
[Loneliness and its association with sociodemographic and health indicators in Brazilian adults and older adults: ELSI-Brazil].Cad Saude Publica. 2023 Jul 21;39(7):e00213222. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT213222. eCollection 2023. Cad Saude Publica. 2023. PMID: 37493723 Free PMC article. Portuguese.
-
Does social media usage ameliorate loneliness in rural youth? A cross sectional pilot study.BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 26;23(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04849-y. BMC Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37237363 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Victor C, Bowling A, Bond J, Scambler S. Loneliness, social isolation, and living alone in later life. ESRC GO Findings. 2003;17:1.
-
- Smith K, Victor C. Profiles of loneliness and social isolation in an English community sample, vol. 46; 2017. Annual conference.
-
- Pyle E, Evans D. Loneliness -what characteristics and circumstances are associated with feeling lonely? In: Analysis of characteristics and circumstances associated with loneliness in England using the community life survey, 2016 to 2017: ONS; 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical