The value of appropriate assessment prior to specialist referral in men with prostatic symptoms
- PMID: 19367426
- DOI: 10.1007/s11845-009-0337-1
The value of appropriate assessment prior to specialist referral in men with prostatic symptoms
Abstract
Background: Referrals to Urology OPD of men with a likely diagnosis of BPH are common.
Aims: To review referrals to OPD of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) to establish how many could have been managed without specialist assessment.
Methods: We reviewed records of 200 male patients referred to OPD with LUTS. We assessed whether the referral source had performed digital rectal examination (DRE), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Bother Score or PSA level.
Results: 74% of patients were referred by GPs. In 31.5% of cases DRE was performed prior to referral. One GP had completed an IPSS, none a Bother Score. 96% had a PSA checked before OPD. Ultimately, 88.5% of our patients were diagnosed with BPH.
Conclusions: With better pre-assessment in the form of DRE, IPSS and Bother Score, allied to a PSA check, many patients with LUTS could be managed in a primary care setting.
Similar articles
-
Digital rectal examination in primary care is important for early detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis study.Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e783-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682861. Br J Gen Pract. 2014. PMID: 25452543 Free PMC article.
-
[The general practitioner's part in the initiation of diagnostic procedures in prostate cancer].Aktuelle Urol. 2008 Mar;39(2):141-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993037. Aktuelle Urol. 2008. PMID: 18379968 German.
-
Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and prostate enlargement in the primary care setting.Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Sep;61(9):1437-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01508.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2007. PMID: 17686091
-
[Referral criteria for benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care.Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria, Sociedad Española de Medicina General, Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria, Asociación Española de Urología].Actas Urol Esp. 2010 Jan;34(1):24-34. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(10)70007-3. Actas Urol Esp. 2010. PMID: 20223130 Spanish.
-
[Referral criteria for benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care].Aten Primaria. 2010 Jan;42(1):36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Nov 14. Aten Primaria. 2010. PMID: 19913947 Free PMC article. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Phytochemicals in Prostate Cancer: From Bioactive Molecules to Upcoming Therapeutic Agents.Nutrients. 2019 Jun 29;11(7):1483. doi: 10.3390/nu11071483. Nutrients. 2019. PMID: 31261861 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review of clinical features of suspected prostate cancer in primary care.Can Fam Physician. 2015 Jan;61(1):e26-35. Can Fam Physician. 2015. PMID: 25756146 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guideline for referral of patients with suspected prostate cancer by family physicians and other primary care providers.Can Fam Physician. 2015 Jan;61(1):33-9. Can Fam Physician. 2015. PMID: 25756141 Free PMC article.
-
The aging male population and medical care for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Canada.Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Apr;4(2):123-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.09092. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010. PMID: 20368896 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous