Buy new:
-10% $16.12
FREE delivery Sunday, July 28 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Ships from: Amazon.com
Sold by: Amazon.com
$16.12 with 10 percent savings
List Price: $17.99

The List Price is the suggested retail price of a new product as provided by a manufacturer, supplier, or seller. Except for books, Amazon will display a List Price if the product was purchased by customers on Amazon or offered by other retailers at or above the List Price in at least the past 90 days. List prices may not necessarily reflect the product's prevailing market price.
Learn more
FREE pickup Sunday, July 28 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or fastest pickup Friday, July 26. Order within 9 hrs 31 mins

1.27 mi | ASHBURN 20147

How pickup works
Pick up from nearby pickup location
Step 1: Place Your Order
Select the “Pickup” option on the product page or during checkout.
Step 2: Receive Notification
Once your package is ready for pickup, you'll receive an email and app notification.
Step 3: Pick up
Bring your order ID or pickup code (if applicable) to your chosen pickup location to pick up your package.
In Stock
$$16.12 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$16.12
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Sold by
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Returnable Yes
Resolutions Eligible for refund or replacement
Return Window 30 days from delivery
Refund Timelines Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here.
Late fee A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’.
Restocking fee A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to Amazon or seller error. See details here.
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Returnable Yes
Resolutions Eligible for refund or replacement
Return Window 30 days from delivery
Refund Timelines Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here.
Late fee A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’.
Restocking fee A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to Amazon or seller error. See details here.

Return instructions

Item must be in original condition and packaging along with tag, accessories, manuals, and inserts. Unlock any electronic device, delete your account and remove all personal information.
Read full return policy
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Heretic's Manifesto Paperback – June 5, 2023


{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$16.12","priceAmount":16.12,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"16","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"12","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"HIIRc3QIUx%2BcUhnkFmgisxWlGlKwpSuolRGjSIwse2AKpF9JKiYok4JcWPbuPxaofKfqtyEP5%2FWEeaKmqm%2B7pm2Ryu0loqIY1H7XMQYVqBrGRR8jlNOglsKBtiQhpsuaZ3MBt8sPu1viXlId4eyV5w%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$12.78","priceAmount":12.78,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"12","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"78","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"HIIRc3QIUx%2BcUhnkFmgisxWlGlKwpSuobEvuQubNYZouyAbQw0S2Ez%2BN0%2BhiBW7M3WWDNrj6N2IMFQ2ztsOL1INE33N%2B1HlkzcwZne5hsxOIzg5%2BQcHlF7lRhHUbuLNgvZp8u7DN%2FsN%2BmVre3Gvm2%2F8Hew%2FlnFtAgbkdT0GxduEFdRtJSTLPz5gIPIiPmN1E","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}],"desktop_buybox_group_2":[{"displayPrice":"$16.12","priceAmount":16.12,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"16","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"12","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"HIIRc3QIUx%2BcUhnkFmgisxWlGlKwpSuolRGjSIwse2AKpF9JKiYok4JcWPbuPxaofKfqtyEP5%2FWEeaKmqm%2B7pm2Ryu0loqIY1H7XMQYVqBrGRR8jlNOglsKBtiQhpsuaZ3MBt8sPu1viXlId4eyV5w%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"PICKUP","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":2}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

Can a woman have a penis? Is the West forever stained by racism? Are we all going to die from climate change? To the liberal establishment of London, New York or Sydney, the answer to all of these questions is ‘Yes’. And anyone who disagrees is a racist, climate-denying transphobe."

Our elites have become convinced of some very strange and extreme ideas. And yet there is precious little pushback against them. Critics are cowed by the threat of shaming, cancellation, even arrest. The new orthodoxies of our age are risible, and yet the space for dissent is shrinking.

We need more heretics. Throughout history, it has been those brave enough to puncture the prevailing groupthink who have propelled society forward. But they are in shockingly short supply today. In this collection of original essays, Brendan O’Neill remakes the case for heresy – and commits a few heresies of his own along the way.


The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Frequently bought together

This item: Heretic's Manifesto
$16.12
Get it as soon as Sunday, Jul 28
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$17.99
Get it as soon as Sunday, Jul 28
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$9.55
Get it as soon as Sunday, Jul 28
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
Choose items to buy together.

Get to know this book

Editorial Reviews

Review

“Brendan O'Neill brings a sharp eye and cutting wit to the follies of our times. You must read this book before it's banned by the new inquisition.” — Tony Abbott, former prime minister of Australia

"Brendan O'Neill is the reincarnation of Christopher Hitchens, a devil's advocate who is willing to always state his case clearly, convincingly and courageously." — Nick Gillespie, editor-at-large for Reason

"A timely and powerful defence of Enlightenment values written by one of the most notable free thinkers of our time.” — Andrew Doyle, author of The New Puritan

"The best, and funniest, writer we have on the multiple insanities gripping the Western world." — Rod Liddle, columnist for the Sunday Times

"One of the world's funniest and fiercest critics of groupthink." — Andrew Bolt, columnist and Sky News Australia host

"One of Britain’s sharpest social commentators." — Daily Telegraph

"An obnoxious intellectual wind-up merchant." — Guardian

About the Author

Brendan O’Neill is the chief political writer for spiked magazine, based in London. He was spiked’s editor from 2007 to 2021. He hosts the weekly podcast "The Brendan O’Neill Show". His writing has appeared in the Spectator, the Sun and the Australian. His previous collections of essays include A Duty to Offend and Anti-Woke.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ London Publishing Partnership (June 5, 2023)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 184 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1913019861
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1913019860
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 11.4 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.14 x 0.42 x 9.21 inches
  • Customer Reviews:

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Brendan O'Neill
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
384 global ratings
"A Heretic's Manifesto" establishes Brendan O'Neill as Britain's Greatest Living Heir To Orwell
5 out of 5 stars
"A Heretic's Manifesto" establishes Brendan O'Neill as Britain's Greatest Living Heir To Orwell
Just a few weeks ago, I was lamenting the absence of any new nonfiction book that I really wanted to read. Many new books of late should have been long articles and were joyless to read.Then I read, in a single sitting, British author Brendan O’Neill’s new collection of essays, A Heretic’s Manifesto: Essays On The Unsayable. It offers one of the most important defenses of liberal democratic civilization and truth ever written.A Heretic’s Manifesto establishes O’Neill as the greatest living British heir to Orwell. I beseech you: stop whatever you’re doing right now and buy his book. As with Orwell, the topic O'Neill is addressing, incipient totalitarianism, is urgent.His writing is flinty and fearless. It is also potent and dangerous, which is exactly what’s needed if we are to stop censorship, the invasion of privacy, and totalitarianism from gaining any more strength.At a minimum, A Heretic’s Manifesto should put to an end your fear, as it did to mine, that English is dead. O’Neill shows that English, the English, and the liberal democratic form of civilization they created are not only alive but vitally necessary to humankind’s future.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2023
The New York Times often reverentially referred to as “The Newspaper of Record,” recently published a front-page story titled “When Students Change Gender Identity and Parents Don’t Know.” The story began by reporting the experience of a mother who learned that her biologically female teenager was, with the approval of her child’s school, using a male name and pronouns, a fact of which the mother had not been informed. Consistent with its use throughout the story of the words “he” and ‘his” in referring to the teenager, the article at one point noted that the student had requested “surgery to remove his breasts.”

Eye-catching, certainly, but not quite at the level of this classic in an earlier report about the issues faced by a biological girl when, in accordance with her gender identification, she used the boys’ bathroom: "There were practical issues. When he had his period, he wondered if he should revert to the girls’ bathroom, because there was no place to throw away his used tampons.”

At a time when a newspaper like the New York Times and many other mainstream institutions take a knee to this kind of insanity, we are in dire need of truth tellers to call them out. As shown in his new collection of essays, "A Heretic’s Manifesto," commonsense will find no more brilliant and cutting a champion in the face of such nonsense than Brendan O’Neil.

He begins by telling us that “[w]e need to talk about her penis.” Nothing, he says, better captures today’s irrationalism and its attendant authoritarianism than the commonplace use of this nonsensical phrase, not only in the fever swamps of the Internet but also in the respectable press. O’Neill cites multiple examples from the British press – and even from police reports and judicial proceedings -- that fully equal in their absurdity those that I have cited above. In several instances, they caused this reader to dissolve into laughter.

Although he is a very funny writer, O’Neill doesn’t think amusement is the right reaction to what he tells us. He recognizes, as did George Orwell, that language can be manipulated to limit and control thought. “Using people’s preferred pronouns, dutifully making a reference like her penis,” he writes, “are not mere acts of niceness but rather are signifiers of subservience to the disrupting ideology of transgenderism.” They sanctify “people’s subjective delusions over and above objective truth,” reflecting “the legion untruths we are all forced to labour under in this era of linguistic and moral tyranny.”

To those who might find this an overstatement of a peril imagined largely by conservatives, Mr. O’Neill counters that the ubiquity of a falsehood of such magnitude “confirms just how insidious the overhaul of speech and thought has become in our era.” He is correct. This is about more than “gender fluidity.”

It is the same post-modern malarkey that has caused the University of Arizona to issue a handbook titled “Diversity and Inclusiveness in the Classroom” asserting that classroom debate “must be an 'accessible space,'” and that “sharing should be based on one’s own feelings, experiences and perceptions.” The handbook discourages students from rebutting feelings that don’t jibe with verifiable reality. Should someone inadvertently challenge a student's feelings by citing factual evidence, the student whose emotions have thus been disrespected is encouraged to say “ouch.”

The same Wall Street Journal column reports that college debate competitions must now be preceded by a pre-debate "on the terms of engagement: whether students are required to cite proof or are free to argue wholly from their feelings and so-called “lived experience.”

Put aside that unless certain physical and mathematical truths are accepted, there will be no further progress in science and technology. How are we ever going to talk to each other about any public issue if we can't argue from evidence-based truth?

And beyond that, O’Neill says, requiring people to genuflect to such rubbish as the price of social acceptability is nothing less than totalitarian.

Early in "Nineteen Eighty-Four," Orwell’s protagonist, Winston Smith, writes this heretical thought in his secret journal: “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.”

And if that is denied – or if social pressure make us hesitant to say “he is he” and “she is she” – we are on the road to unfreedom.

O’Neill’s opening essay on ”Her Penis” is the best in "A Heretic’s Manifesto" and well reflects his view that such outlandish claptrap must be resisted, resolutely and unflinchingly, even if anodyne acceptance would be more socially convenient. But his eviscerations of climate catastrophizing, the Covid lockdown, white self-abnegation, unwarranted claims of “Islamophobia” and the hysterical reaction of transgender ideologues to feminists who stand up for women’s rights, are also bracing, and will delight at least those who share his outlook on these subjects.

Highly recommended.
21 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 14, 2023
Words can be hurtful. Words are our secret power as individuals. As our culture and politics demands linguistic limits, it also limits our expressions, which limit our self-knowledge. This self-knowledge that we lose, invites group think.
11 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on June 28, 2023
Some great anecdotes in the AYFKM vein, dark humor and, in the end, a hopeful call to courageously stand firm against the BS. Recommended.
11 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 9, 2023
Just a few weeks ago, I was lamenting the absence of any new nonfiction book that I really wanted to read. Many new books of late should have been long articles and were joyless to read.

Then I read, in a single sitting, British author Brendan O’Neill’s new collection of essays, A Heretic’s Manifesto: Essays On The Unsayable. It offers one of the most important defenses of liberal democratic civilization and truth ever written.

A Heretic’s Manifesto establishes O’Neill as the greatest living British heir to Orwell. I beseech you: stop whatever you’re doing right now and buy his book. As with Orwell, the topic O'Neill is addressing, incipient totalitarianism, is urgent.

His writing is flinty and fearless. It is also potent and dangerous, which is exactly what’s needed if we are to stop censorship, the invasion of privacy, and totalitarianism from gaining any more strength.

At a minimum, A Heretic’s Manifesto should put to an end your fear, as it did to mine, that English is dead. O’Neill shows that English, the English, and the liberal democratic form of civilization they created are not only alive but vitally necessary to humankind’s future.
Customer image
5.0 out of 5 stars "A Heretic's Manifesto" establishes Brendan O'Neill as Britain's Greatest Living Heir To Orwell
Reviewed in the United States on July 9, 2023
Just a few weeks ago, I was lamenting the absence of any new nonfiction book that I really wanted to read. Many new books of late should have been long articles and were joyless to read.

Then I read, in a single sitting, British author Brendan O’Neill’s new collection of essays, A Heretic’s Manifesto: Essays On The Unsayable. It offers one of the most important defenses of liberal democratic civilization and truth ever written.

A Heretic’s Manifesto establishes O’Neill as the greatest living British heir to Orwell. I beseech you: stop whatever you’re doing right now and buy his book. As with Orwell, the topic O'Neill is addressing, incipient totalitarianism, is urgent.

His writing is flinty and fearless. It is also potent and dangerous, which is exactly what’s needed if we are to stop censorship, the invasion of privacy, and totalitarianism from gaining any more strength.

At a minimum, A Heretic’s Manifesto should put to an end your fear, as it did to mine, that English is dead. O’Neill shows that English, the English, and the liberal democratic form of civilization they created are not only alive but vitally necessary to humankind’s future.
Images in this review
Customer image
Customer image
17 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2024
O'Neill argues from a thin pretext of pretending to support gay people, presuming this gives him moral license to insult and delegitimize trans people.

We already know he targets gay people too. For years, he’s published opinion articles on this theme, and he testified at a government hearing, an official transcript of which he put on his own website. (This information is public, not private. It’s relevant to the book he went on to write.) He doesn’t read gay authors or interview gay people; why bother? He just believes that straight people shouldn’t allow gay people to get married. Supposedly, in his long-held view, gay people don’t want to get married anyway; rather, the entire gay marriage campaign was comprised of “the elites” virtue-signaling to each other and thinking up ways to marginalize non-elites. Furthermore, so he held, if gay people are allowed to get married, the state will be infantilizing them (by virtue of giving them the recognition they need), and this will negatively impact straight people’s sense of themselves (I guess straight people need to receive recognition, and satisfying this need doesn’t constitute infantilization in his view for some reason).

This book, A Heretic’s Manifesto, continues the theme. This time, without reading trans authors or interviewing trans people, O’Neill argues that trans people are fake. Centrally to his thesis, he says that trans people’s existence makes non-trans people feel bad about themselves. More specifically, in his allegation, trans people existing make gay people feel bad about themselves. He’s running with his own playbook for the word “h---ph----“ (i.e., anti-gay), wielding it as an insult against trans people to tell them to shut up. (In his previous essays, he’d accused “the elites” of using the word this way, but now it seems he’s discovered it’s more fun to use the playbook himself and do the same thing he once accused others of doing.)

In this book, he expends many words to communicate his negative opinions of trans people, and he spends no words on the consequence of his words for anyone LGBTQ. Obviously, calling someone fake contributes to their social exclusion and threatens their basic rights. Obviously, doing a "just asking questions!" to wonder how you'd handle a hypothetical murderer is a way of portraying an entire group as murderers, and that's an unfair stereotype. Yet O’Neill only worries about the consequence of his words for straight people. (Yes, I know there’s a different, neutral word to refer to non-trans people and that “straight” isn’t it, but I’m trying to get through the tech filter here and I don’t know what words trip it.)

He’s asking you to believe that his feelings matter and his perceptions are accurate — and that trans people's feelings don't and aren't.

He seems to believe he's threaded the needle to be anti-LGBTQ while congratulating himself for being pro-LGB. Such self-contradiction isn't original. Lots of people use this trope.

Oh, and if you criticize him? You’re cancelling him— no, actually, this is worse than cancellation, he says — this is a proper Inquisition! He does admit that nothing’s literally on fire and that today's cultural climate only has the “vibe” of an Inquisition. He hopes to fend off rational criticism by telling you he’s the victim. But that isn’t how rational criticism works.

What does sometimes succeed in fending off rational criticism, unfortunately, is the auto-filter on review sites. My previous version of this review gave more detail about my thoughts about the book, chapter by chapter, but I received an automatic email that my review might contain one or more of “profanity,” “harassment,” “hate speech,” “sexual content,” “illegal activity,” and “private information.” So that’s how it is. This author is allowed to sell a book whose purpose is to contribute to harassment and hate speech against trans people specifically, and when trans people respond with specific detail to explain why the book is false, illogical, self-contradictory, unfair, and puts trans people at risk, our criticism is deleted. Speaking of “essays on the unsayable” (the subtitle of this book).

Though the book is devoted to the metaphor of heresy, O'Neill spends no time discussing his lack of religious belief nor his experiences as an atheist. My guess is that he wants to avoid alienating the members of his audience who are religious. If you're hoping to find atheism in this book, you'll be disappointed.

This book works by its demagogic spirit. Its premise: You’re voiceless. Its remedy: Let this author be your anti-LGBTQ voice.

Anyone can learn to spot the contradictions in this book. Especially if you care about a trans person and believe that society can be trans-inclusive, nothing in this book will appeal to you to begin with.
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on September 3, 2023
First chapter good, after that ...

Top reviews from other countries

Wagner Leal Arienti
5.0 out of 5 stars Leitura para quem está incorformado com a nova forma de censura.
Reviewed in Brazil on September 2, 2023
O título do livro preenche as expectativas. É um manifesto para a heresia e contra as novas formas de censura que se apresentam como politicamente corretas, mas que são a imposição de uma limitação à liberdade de expressão e de pensar. A leitura dos capítulos apresenta, de um lado, o poder opressor de visões dogmáticas com roupagem de politicamente corretas e de engenharia social para um suposto mundo melhor. De outro lado, é uma crítica à visão unilateral imposta por uma elite cultural, e apoiada pela elite econômica, pois virou um novo negócio, e um chamado para renovação de ideias herética.
Lottie
5.0 out of 5 stars Essential reading in these Orwellian times
Reviewed in Germany on September 15, 2023
This book should be required reading for young university students. It describes our times brilliantly and poignantly. Thank you, Brendan!
SHIELDFAN
5.0 out of 5 stars A BLUEPRINT FOR THE RETURN OF SANITY AND COMMONSENSE
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 8, 2023
I bought this book, and read it alongside, Rakib Ehsan’s BEYOND GRIEVANCE. In terms of key messages, there is an amazing degree of commonality between the two. They are both critical of the cult of victimhood. They both attack the undermining of democracy that manifested itself in desperate attempts to undermine the result of the EU referendum. Neither has anything good to say about Black Lives Matter ; in fact, O’Neill observes that Martin Luther King’s desire to move from racism to colour-blindness would itself be seen as racist today and would result in de-platforming. But whilst Ehsan’s book focuses mainly around race, O’Neill’s covers a wider spectrum and is all the better for doing so.

O’Neill’s analysis of the current mania for looking for “hate speech” at every opportunity is first class and his choice of examples memorable. He rightly points out that decades of progress on gay rights is being undone by the transgender movement, which now regards homosexuality as “transphobic bigotry”. He backs up his argument by stating factually that the now closed Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) clinic saw many young people who claimed to be gender-dysphoric but in reality were gay, and sent them on the ghastly transgender path.

Like Ehsan in BEYOND GRIEVANCE, O’Neill is critical of the total hypocrisy evident in the corrosive 2020s disease of identitariansim. It’s self-evident in the attitude of those who call for race-based “safe spaces” whilst advocating that biological males who identify as female should be allowed to enter very necessary and hard-won women-only safe spaces. Likewise, there’s no shortage of hypocrisy in the “be kind” lobby, the same lobby that called for older voters (meaning what precisely?) to be banned from voting and wished an early grave on Brexiteers. He documents extensively the racial slurs lobbed by mainly white “liberals” at prominent public figures of black African or Caribbean origin who dare to defy the identitarians’ favourite narrative. He mentions Professor Tony Sewell, author of the Sewell Report on Racial Disparity, being called a “house Negro” and Sir Trevor Phillips, former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, being called an “Uncle Tom.” Rakib Ehsan recalls in BEYOND GRIEVANCE how he has been subject to a similar slur not previously heard, namely “Tandoori Mosley.” Whoever thinks up these slurs can’t have much to do.

O’Neill’s criticism of “epistocracy” – rule by those who think they know it all – is predictably scathing and in fact so close to that voiced by Ehsan in BEYOND GRIEVANCE that if you have read the two books in succession, you suspect that the two authors collaborated. But both are spot on and illustrate their criticisms convincingly. One particularly disturbing aspect of “epistocratic” rule that we are seeing increasingly is censorship. O’Neill rightly casts doubt on the ability of “epistocrats” to target it appropriately. He says, “Once you let censorship off its leash, there is no stopping it.” Considering that there has been at least once case of a train driver being disciplined for using the phrase “ladies and gentlemen,” which is now apparently “transphobic hate speech,” O’Neill can hardly be accused of exaggerating.

The UK is in desperate need of a return to sanity, democracy, free speech and commonsense, crucial attributes of a successful nation that a new generation of so-called “liberals” appears to hate. As a thoroughly researched and readable contribution to the debate that we must have if we are to reclaim these values, O’Neill’s book passes with distinction. I give it five well-deserved stars.
65 people found this helpful
Report
Steve
5.0 out of 5 stars Amazing!!!
Reviewed in Australia on November 12, 2023
I loved this book! Free speech at its core!
Tsiporah
5.0 out of 5 stars full of insights we wish we had thought of
Reviewed in Canada on November 27, 2023
O'Neill is an articulate writer. Some sentences are so brilliant, packed with so much truth, that it is a treat to read such thoughtful writing.
One person found this helpful
Report