![Amazon prime logo](https://cdn.statically.io/img/m.media-amazon.com/images/G/01/marketing/prime/new_prime_logo_RGB_blue._CB426090081_.png)
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-10% $16.12$16.12
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$12.78$12.78
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Bay State Book Company
Learn more
1.27 mi | ASHBURN 20147
Returnable | Yes |
---|---|
Resolutions | Eligible for refund or replacement |
Return Window | 30 days from delivery |
Refund Timelines | Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here. |
Late fee | A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’. |
Restocking fee | A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to Amazon or seller error. See details here. |
Return instructions
Item must be in original condition and packaging along with tag, accessories, manuals, and inserts. Unlock any electronic device, delete your account and remove all personal information. |
Returnable | Yes |
---|---|
Resolutions | Eligible for refund or replacement |
Return Window | 30 days from delivery |
Refund Timelines | Typically, an advance refund will be issued within 24 hours of a drop-off or pick-up. For returns that require physical verification, refund issuance may take up to 30 days after drop-off or pick up. Where an advance refund is issued, we will re-charge your payment method if we do not receive the correct item in original condition. See details here. |
Late fee | A late fee of 20% of the item price will apply if you complete the drop off or pick up after the ‘Return By Date’. |
Restocking fee | A restocking fee may apply if the item is not returned in original condition and original packaging, or is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to Amazon or seller error. See details here. |
Return instructions
Item must be in original condition and packaging along with tag, accessories, manuals, and inserts. Unlock any electronic device, delete your account and remove all personal information. |
![Kindle app logo image](https://cdn.statically.io/img/m.media-amazon.com/images/G/01/kindle/app/kindle-app-logo._CB668847749_.png)
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Heretic's Manifesto Paperback – June 5, 2023
Purchase options and add-ons
Can a woman have a penis? Is the West forever stained by racism? Are we all going to die from climate change? To the liberal establishment of London, New York or Sydney, the answer to all of these questions is ‘Yes’. And anyone who disagrees is a racist, climate-denying transphobe."
Our elites have become convinced of some very strange and extreme ideas. And yet there is precious little pushback against them. Critics are cowed by the threat of shaming, cancellation, even arrest. The new orthodoxies of our age are risible, and yet the space for dissent is shrinking.
We need more heretics. Throughout history, it has been those brave enough to puncture the prevailing groupthink who have propelled society forward. But they are in shockingly short supply today. In this collection of original essays, Brendan O’Neill remakes the case for heresy – and commits a few heresies of his own along the way.
- Print length184 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherLondon Publishing Partnership
- Publication dateJune 5, 2023
- Dimensions6.14 x 0.42 x 9.21 inches
- ISBN-101913019861
- ISBN-13978-1913019860
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
![Heretic's Manifesto](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/612qL8vN+HL._AC_UL116_SR116,116_.jpg)
Similar items that may ship from close to you
- Social Justice FallaciesHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Jul 28
- A Right to PlunderPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Jul 28
- America's Cultural Revolution: How the Radical Left Conquered EverythingHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Jul 28
- The End of Race Politics: Arguments for a Colorblind AmericaHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Jul 28
- Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing UpHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Jul 28
- Against Empathy: The Case for Rational CompassionPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Jul 29
Get to know this book
What's it about?
This book is about the need for more heretics to challenge extreme ideas and the shrinking space for dissent.Popular highlight
Orwell understood very well the relationship between language and thought, and how control of the former permits control of the latter: ‘[If] thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.’84 Kindle readers highlighted this
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Brendan O'Neill brings a sharp eye and cutting wit to the follies of our times. You must read this book before it's banned by the new inquisition.” — Tony Abbott, former prime minister of Australia
"Brendan O'Neill is the reincarnation of Christopher Hitchens, a devil's advocate who is willing to always state his case clearly, convincingly and courageously." — Nick Gillespie, editor-at-large for Reason
"A timely and powerful defence of Enlightenment values written by one of the most notable free thinkers of our time.” — Andrew Doyle, author of The New Puritan
"The best, and funniest, writer we have on the multiple insanities gripping the Western world." — Rod Liddle, columnist for the Sunday Times
"One of the world's funniest and fiercest critics of groupthink." — Andrew Bolt, columnist and Sky News Australia host
"One of Britain’s sharpest social commentators." — Daily Telegraph
"An obnoxious intellectual wind-up merchant." — Guardian
About the Author
Brendan O’Neill is the chief political writer for spiked magazine, based in London. He was spiked’s editor from 2007 to 2021. He hosts the weekly podcast "The Brendan O’Neill Show". His writing has appeared in the Spectator, the Sun and the Australian. His previous collections of essays include A Duty to Offend and Anti-Woke.
Product details
- Publisher : London Publishing Partnership (June 5, 2023)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 184 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1913019861
- ISBN-13 : 978-1913019860
- Item Weight : 11.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 0.42 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #528,994 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #581 in Censorship & Politics
- #1,196 in Political Commentary & Opinion
- #1,755 in Essays (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
![Brendan O'Neill](https://cdn.statically.io/img/m.media-amazon.com/images/I/01Kv-W2ysOL._SY600_.png)
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
!["A Heretic's Manifesto" establishes Brendan O'Neill as Britain's Greatest Living Heir To Orwell](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/G/01/x-locale/common/transparent-pixel._V192234675_.gif)
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Eye-catching, certainly, but not quite at the level of this classic in an earlier report about the issues faced by a biological girl when, in accordance with her gender identification, she used the boys’ bathroom: "There were practical issues. When he had his period, he wondered if he should revert to the girls’ bathroom, because there was no place to throw away his used tampons.”
At a time when a newspaper like the New York Times and many other mainstream institutions take a knee to this kind of insanity, we are in dire need of truth tellers to call them out. As shown in his new collection of essays, "A Heretic’s Manifesto," commonsense will find no more brilliant and cutting a champion in the face of such nonsense than Brendan O’Neil.
He begins by telling us that “[w]e need to talk about her penis.” Nothing, he says, better captures today’s irrationalism and its attendant authoritarianism than the commonplace use of this nonsensical phrase, not only in the fever swamps of the Internet but also in the respectable press. O’Neill cites multiple examples from the British press – and even from police reports and judicial proceedings -- that fully equal in their absurdity those that I have cited above. In several instances, they caused this reader to dissolve into laughter.
Although he is a very funny writer, O’Neill doesn’t think amusement is the right reaction to what he tells us. He recognizes, as did George Orwell, that language can be manipulated to limit and control thought. “Using people’s preferred pronouns, dutifully making a reference like her penis,” he writes, “are not mere acts of niceness but rather are signifiers of subservience to the disrupting ideology of transgenderism.” They sanctify “people’s subjective delusions over and above objective truth,” reflecting “the legion untruths we are all forced to labour under in this era of linguistic and moral tyranny.”
To those who might find this an overstatement of a peril imagined largely by conservatives, Mr. O’Neill counters that the ubiquity of a falsehood of such magnitude “confirms just how insidious the overhaul of speech and thought has become in our era.” He is correct. This is about more than “gender fluidity.”
It is the same post-modern malarkey that has caused the University of Arizona to issue a handbook titled “Diversity and Inclusiveness in the Classroom” asserting that classroom debate “must be an 'accessible space,'” and that “sharing should be based on one’s own feelings, experiences and perceptions.” The handbook discourages students from rebutting feelings that don’t jibe with verifiable reality. Should someone inadvertently challenge a student's feelings by citing factual evidence, the student whose emotions have thus been disrespected is encouraged to say “ouch.”
The same Wall Street Journal column reports that college debate competitions must now be preceded by a pre-debate "on the terms of engagement: whether students are required to cite proof or are free to argue wholly from their feelings and so-called “lived experience.”
Put aside that unless certain physical and mathematical truths are accepted, there will be no further progress in science and technology. How are we ever going to talk to each other about any public issue if we can't argue from evidence-based truth?
And beyond that, O’Neill says, requiring people to genuflect to such rubbish as the price of social acceptability is nothing less than totalitarian.
Early in "Nineteen Eighty-Four," Orwell’s protagonist, Winston Smith, writes this heretical thought in his secret journal: “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.”
And if that is denied – or if social pressure make us hesitant to say “he is he” and “she is she” – we are on the road to unfreedom.
O’Neill’s opening essay on ”Her Penis” is the best in "A Heretic’s Manifesto" and well reflects his view that such outlandish claptrap must be resisted, resolutely and unflinchingly, even if anodyne acceptance would be more socially convenient. But his eviscerations of climate catastrophizing, the Covid lockdown, white self-abnegation, unwarranted claims of “Islamophobia” and the hysterical reaction of transgender ideologues to feminists who stand up for women’s rights, are also bracing, and will delight at least those who share his outlook on these subjects.
Highly recommended.
Then I read, in a single sitting, British author Brendan O’Neill’s new collection of essays, A Heretic’s Manifesto: Essays On The Unsayable. It offers one of the most important defenses of liberal democratic civilization and truth ever written.
A Heretic’s Manifesto establishes O’Neill as the greatest living British heir to Orwell. I beseech you: stop whatever you’re doing right now and buy his book. As with Orwell, the topic O'Neill is addressing, incipient totalitarianism, is urgent.
His writing is flinty and fearless. It is also potent and dangerous, which is exactly what’s needed if we are to stop censorship, the invasion of privacy, and totalitarianism from gaining any more strength.
At a minimum, A Heretic’s Manifesto should put to an end your fear, as it did to mine, that English is dead. O’Neill shows that English, the English, and the liberal democratic form of civilization they created are not only alive but vitally necessary to humankind’s future.
![Customer image](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/G/01/x-locale/common/transparent-pixel._V192234675_.gif)
Reviewed in the United States on July 9, 2023
Then I read, in a single sitting, British author Brendan O’Neill’s new collection of essays, A Heretic’s Manifesto: Essays On The Unsayable. It offers one of the most important defenses of liberal democratic civilization and truth ever written.
A Heretic’s Manifesto establishes O’Neill as the greatest living British heir to Orwell. I beseech you: stop whatever you’re doing right now and buy his book. As with Orwell, the topic O'Neill is addressing, incipient totalitarianism, is urgent.
His writing is flinty and fearless. It is also potent and dangerous, which is exactly what’s needed if we are to stop censorship, the invasion of privacy, and totalitarianism from gaining any more strength.
At a minimum, A Heretic’s Manifesto should put to an end your fear, as it did to mine, that English is dead. O’Neill shows that English, the English, and the liberal democratic form of civilization they created are not only alive but vitally necessary to humankind’s future.
![Customer image](https://cdn.statically.io/img/m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71AAMVNGUOL._SY88.jpg)
We already know he targets gay people too. For years, he’s published opinion articles on this theme, and he testified at a government hearing, an official transcript of which he put on his own website. (This information is public, not private. It’s relevant to the book he went on to write.) He doesn’t read gay authors or interview gay people; why bother? He just believes that straight people shouldn’t allow gay people to get married. Supposedly, in his long-held view, gay people don’t want to get married anyway; rather, the entire gay marriage campaign was comprised of “the elites” virtue-signaling to each other and thinking up ways to marginalize non-elites. Furthermore, so he held, if gay people are allowed to get married, the state will be infantilizing them (by virtue of giving them the recognition they need), and this will negatively impact straight people’s sense of themselves (I guess straight people need to receive recognition, and satisfying this need doesn’t constitute infantilization in his view for some reason).
This book, A Heretic’s Manifesto, continues the theme. This time, without reading trans authors or interviewing trans people, O’Neill argues that trans people are fake. Centrally to his thesis, he says that trans people’s existence makes non-trans people feel bad about themselves. More specifically, in his allegation, trans people existing make gay people feel bad about themselves. He’s running with his own playbook for the word “h---ph----“ (i.e., anti-gay), wielding it as an insult against trans people to tell them to shut up. (In his previous essays, he’d accused “the elites” of using the word this way, but now it seems he’s discovered it’s more fun to use the playbook himself and do the same thing he once accused others of doing.)
In this book, he expends many words to communicate his negative opinions of trans people, and he spends no words on the consequence of his words for anyone LGBTQ. Obviously, calling someone fake contributes to their social exclusion and threatens their basic rights. Obviously, doing a "just asking questions!" to wonder how you'd handle a hypothetical murderer is a way of portraying an entire group as murderers, and that's an unfair stereotype. Yet O’Neill only worries about the consequence of his words for straight people. (Yes, I know there’s a different, neutral word to refer to non-trans people and that “straight” isn’t it, but I’m trying to get through the tech filter here and I don’t know what words trip it.)
He’s asking you to believe that his feelings matter and his perceptions are accurate — and that trans people's feelings don't and aren't.
He seems to believe he's threaded the needle to be anti-LGBTQ while congratulating himself for being pro-LGB. Such self-contradiction isn't original. Lots of people use this trope.
Oh, and if you criticize him? You’re cancelling him— no, actually, this is worse than cancellation, he says — this is a proper Inquisition! He does admit that nothing’s literally on fire and that today's cultural climate only has the “vibe” of an Inquisition. He hopes to fend off rational criticism by telling you he’s the victim. But that isn’t how rational criticism works.
What does sometimes succeed in fending off rational criticism, unfortunately, is the auto-filter on review sites. My previous version of this review gave more detail about my thoughts about the book, chapter by chapter, but I received an automatic email that my review might contain one or more of “profanity,” “harassment,” “hate speech,” “sexual content,” “illegal activity,” and “private information.” So that’s how it is. This author is allowed to sell a book whose purpose is to contribute to harassment and hate speech against trans people specifically, and when trans people respond with specific detail to explain why the book is false, illogical, self-contradictory, unfair, and puts trans people at risk, our criticism is deleted. Speaking of “essays on the unsayable” (the subtitle of this book).
Though the book is devoted to the metaphor of heresy, O'Neill spends no time discussing his lack of religious belief nor his experiences as an atheist. My guess is that he wants to avoid alienating the members of his audience who are religious. If you're hoping to find atheism in this book, you'll be disappointed.
This book works by its demagogic spirit. Its premise: You’re voiceless. Its remedy: Let this author be your anti-LGBTQ voice.
Anyone can learn to spot the contradictions in this book. Especially if you care about a trans person and believe that society can be trans-inclusive, nothing in this book will appeal to you to begin with.
Top reviews from other countries
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/default._CR0,0,1024,1024_SX48_.png)
![](https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/default._CR0,0,1024,1024_SX48_.png)
![](https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/b54c52d9-0793-473a-adfc-b3e8c0481eb2._CR62,0,375,375_SX48_.jpg)
O’Neill’s analysis of the current mania for looking for “hate speech” at every opportunity is first class and his choice of examples memorable. He rightly points out that decades of progress on gay rights is being undone by the transgender movement, which now regards homosexuality as “transphobic bigotry”. He backs up his argument by stating factually that the now closed Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) clinic saw many young people who claimed to be gender-dysphoric but in reality were gay, and sent them on the ghastly transgender path.
Like Ehsan in BEYOND GRIEVANCE, O’Neill is critical of the total hypocrisy evident in the corrosive 2020s disease of identitariansim. It’s self-evident in the attitude of those who call for race-based “safe spaces” whilst advocating that biological males who identify as female should be allowed to enter very necessary and hard-won women-only safe spaces. Likewise, there’s no shortage of hypocrisy in the “be kind” lobby, the same lobby that called for older voters (meaning what precisely?) to be banned from voting and wished an early grave on Brexiteers. He documents extensively the racial slurs lobbed by mainly white “liberals” at prominent public figures of black African or Caribbean origin who dare to defy the identitarians’ favourite narrative. He mentions Professor Tony Sewell, author of the Sewell Report on Racial Disparity, being called a “house Negro” and Sir Trevor Phillips, former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, being called an “Uncle Tom.” Rakib Ehsan recalls in BEYOND GRIEVANCE how he has been subject to a similar slur not previously heard, namely “Tandoori Mosley.” Whoever thinks up these slurs can’t have much to do.
O’Neill’s criticism of “epistocracy” – rule by those who think they know it all – is predictably scathing and in fact so close to that voiced by Ehsan in BEYOND GRIEVANCE that if you have read the two books in succession, you suspect that the two authors collaborated. But both are spot on and illustrate their criticisms convincingly. One particularly disturbing aspect of “epistocratic” rule that we are seeing increasingly is censorship. O’Neill rightly casts doubt on the ability of “epistocrats” to target it appropriately. He says, “Once you let censorship off its leash, there is no stopping it.” Considering that there has been at least once case of a train driver being disciplined for using the phrase “ladies and gentlemen,” which is now apparently “transphobic hate speech,” O’Neill can hardly be accused of exaggerating.
The UK is in desperate need of a return to sanity, democracy, free speech and commonsense, crucial attributes of a successful nation that a new generation of so-called “liberals” appears to hate. As a thoroughly researched and readable contribution to the debate that we must have if we are to reclaim these values, O’Neill’s book passes with distinction. I give it five well-deserved stars.
![](https://images-fe.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/default._CR0,0,1024,1024_SX48_.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/default._CR0,0,1024,1024_SX48_.png)