Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

A Heretic's Manifesto: Essays on the Unsayable Paperback – 5 Jun. 2023


{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"£12.18","priceAmount":12.18,"currencySymbol":"£","integerValue":"12","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"18","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"faYl7D8Q5hlGo19JARNl%2Fs%2Bps2dYso7VcNp29EOxk2cx7tQ%2BcYHR4WW1hvpivTp2HR8lsBURYjn5lIiH62HYEMm8RrUG1RVadri2EusW88VBX7rfFXpZiCSOHJoDpJMv","locale":"en-GB","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

Can a woman have a penis? Is the West forever stained by racism? Are we all going to die from climate change? To the liberal establishment of London, New York or Sydney, the answer to all of these questions is ‘Yes’. And anyone who disagrees is a racist, climate-denying transphobe.

Our elites have become convinced of some very strange and extreme ideas. And yet there is precious little pushback against them. Critics are cowed by the threat of shaming, cancellation, even arrest. The new orthodoxies of our age are risible, and yet the space for dissent is shrinking.

We need more heretics. Throughout history, it has been those brave enough to puncture the prevailing groupthink who have propelled society forward. But they are in shockingly short supply today. In this collection of original essays, Brendan O’Neill remakes the case for heresy – and commits a few heresies of his own along the way.


Special offers and product promotions

  • Buy this product and stream 90 days of Amazon Music Unlimited for free. E-mail after purchase. Conditions apply. Learn more

Frequently bought together

This item: A Heretic's Manifesto: Essays on the Unsayable
£12.18
In stock
Sent from and sold by Amazon.
+
£9.39
In stock
Sent from and sold by Amazon.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your basket.
Details
Added to Basket
Choose items to buy together.

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
390 global ratings

Customers say

Customers find the writing style great, witty, and lucid. They describe the reading experience as excellent, insightful, and easy to read. Readers also appreciate the solid arguments and clear thinking.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

14 customers mention ‘Reading experience’14 positive0 negative

Customers find the book an excellent, brave, and fantastic work.

"...As a thoroughly researched and readable contribution to the debate that we must have if we are to reclaim these values, O’Neill’s book passes with..." Read more

"...An excellent read." Read more

"...but even when we aren’t on the same page, so to speak, he is worth a read...." Read more

"Superb." Read more

12 customers mention ‘Content’12 positive0 negative

Customers find the book insightful, easy to read, and convincingly illustrate their criticisms. They also appreciate the author's use of facts, solid arguments, and clear thinking to skewer the anti-liberal authoritarianism driving today's society. Customers also say the book is refreshing and brave.

"...As a thoroughly researched and readable contribution to the debate that we must have if we are to reclaim these values, O’Neill’s book passes with..." Read more

"‘A Heretic’s Manifesto’ is witty, lucid, enlightened, and patently the product of deep reading and deliberation on the question of freedom and its..." Read more

"Well written, very relevant" Read more

"A wonderful expose of the anti-liberal authoritarianism driving today's so-called culture wars...." Read more

10 customers mention ‘Writing style’10 positive0 negative

Customers find the writing style of the book great, witty, lucid, and engrossing. They also say it's brilliantly written, articulate, and insightful.

"‘A Heretic’s Manifesto’ is witty, lucid, enlightened, and patently the product of deep reading and deliberation on the question of freedom and its..." Read more

"Well written, very relevant" Read more

"O'Neill writes with his customary clarity and flowing style about the numerous modern-day dogmas and the ferocious reactions often encountered..." Read more

"Superbly written and heavily researched (with sources) of the relentless attack on Western cultures and identities...." Read more

Top reviews from United Kingdom

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 8 July 2023
I bought this book, and read it alongside, Rakib Ehsan’s BEYOND GRIEVANCE. In terms of key messages, there is an amazing degree of commonality between the two. They are both critical of the cult of victimhood. They both attack the undermining of democracy that manifested itself in desperate attempts to undermine the result of the EU referendum. Neither has anything good to say about Black Lives Matter ; in fact, O’Neill observes that Martin Luther King’s desire to move from racism to colour-blindness would itself be seen as racist today and would result in de-platforming. But whilst Ehsan’s book focuses mainly around race, O’Neill’s covers a wider spectrum and is all the better for doing so.

O’Neill’s analysis of the current mania for looking for “hate speech” at every opportunity is first class and his choice of examples memorable. He rightly points out that decades of progress on gay rights is being undone by the transgender movement, which now regards homosexuality as “transphobic bigotry”. He backs up his argument by stating factually that the now closed Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) clinic saw many young people who claimed to be gender-dysphoric but in reality were gay, and sent them on the ghastly transgender path.

Like Ehsan in BEYOND GRIEVANCE, O’Neill is critical of the total hypocrisy evident in the corrosive 2020s disease of identitariansim. It’s self-evident in the attitude of those who call for race-based “safe spaces” whilst advocating that biological males who identify as female should be allowed to enter very necessary and hard-won women-only safe spaces. Likewise, there’s no shortage of hypocrisy in the “be kind” lobby, the same lobby that called for older voters (meaning what precisely?) to be banned from voting and wished an early grave on Brexiteers. He documents extensively the racial slurs lobbed by mainly white “liberals” at prominent public figures of black African or Caribbean origin who dare to defy the identitarians’ favourite narrative. He mentions Professor Tony Sewell, author of the Sewell Report on Racial Disparity, being called a “house Negro” and Sir Trevor Phillips, former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, being called an “Uncle Tom.” Rakib Ehsan recalls in BEYOND GRIEVANCE how he has been subject to a similar slur not previously heard, namely “Tandoori Mosley.” Whoever thinks up these slurs can’t have much to do.

O’Neill’s criticism of “epistocracy” – rule by those who think they know it all – is predictably scathing and in fact so close to that voiced by Ehsan in BEYOND GRIEVANCE that if you have read the two books in succession, you suspect that the two authors collaborated. But both are spot on and illustrate their criticisms convincingly. One particularly disturbing aspect of “epistocratic” rule that we are seeing increasingly is censorship. O’Neill rightly casts doubt on the ability of “epistocrats” to target it appropriately. He says, “Once you let censorship off its leash, there is no stopping it.” Considering that there has been at least once case of a train driver being disciplined for using the phrase “ladies and gentlemen,” which is now apparently “transphobic hate speech,” O’Neill can hardly be accused of exaggerating.

The UK is in desperate need of a return to sanity, democracy, free speech and commonsense, crucial attributes of a successful nation that a new generation of so-called “liberals” appears to hate. As a thoroughly researched and readable contribution to the debate that we must have if we are to reclaim these values, O’Neill’s book passes with distinction. I give it five well-deserved stars.
65 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 17 June 2023
‘A Heretic’s Manifesto’ is witty, lucid, enlightened, and patently the product of deep reading and deliberation on the question of freedom and its antithesis. A polemic that stands in the very best tradition of radical thought.

O’Neill summons the historical figures of William Tyndale, John Lilburne, John Milton, and JS Mill to the cause of democracy which is under sustained attack by contemporary elites. The chapter entitled ‘Rise of the Pigs’ encapsulates O’Neill’s spirited defence of the Enlightenment against its present-day detractors. Democracy is not necessarily about outcomes, but the decision-making process itself which gives concrete form to the participation of the demos in public life. This is why democracy matters.

O’Neill quotes Milton who describes reason as choosing: ‘for reason is but choosing’. And the exercise of democratic choice is the exercise of reason. It is the exercise of our moral and intellectual faculties. That’s a universal human attribute. The black Haitian revolutionaries saw in the French Revolution the tools of their own emancipation. Just as Martin Luther King two centuries later saw in the words and ideals of the American Declaration of Independence the road to liberty and equality for black Americans. MLK challenged contemporary US society to fulfil the rhetoric of its founding fathers. Only then could the US claim to be the land of the free.

Today the past is dismissed as toxic. The legacy of the past, our collective and universal inheritance, is dismissed and traduced. The baleful influence of racial thinking has been resurrected. Language is a site of linguistic control. Censorship is rampant. ‘"You will say what we allow you to say." This is the message behind 'hate speech' laws. They are a means of social control, and more ominously an attempt at thought control, of policing our 'inner life'.

So, what is to be done? O’Neill calls for courage and solidarity. The more we raise our heads above the parapet, the more we refuse to be censored and exercise our right to be offensive, to exercise free speech and independent thought, the better it will be for us all. Including or especially the young who are being denied intellectual tools, the unfettered use of language and therefore the use of concepts and the exercise of reason, to make sense of the world. And to make their way in it. This is critical.

For example, the younger generation are denied the words, the language to express solidarity with the people of Iran and their struggle for freedom because to express that solidarity in today’s climate would be deemed ‘Islamophobic’. It would be deemed offensive to Muslims. Which begs the question are Iranian women ditching the burqa and protesting the hijab Islamophobic too? They are certainly deemed offensive to the ayatollahs and the repressive theocratic dictatorship in Iran. Sometimes it is necessary to be offensive. Freedom depends upon it.

Everywhere the new Inquisition is searching for heretics and their alleged phobias. We must resist this tyranny. Censorship enfeebles us and it begets violence. Hatred is encouraged against dissenters and non-conformists. The echoes of the past are everywhere today but not in the way that progressives recognise. Their intolerance, hatred, and censoriousness, carried out in the name of social justice, has precedence. In the Inquisition, with its fear of heresy, its suspicion and distrust of people.

O’Neill informs us the word ‘heresy’ comes from the Greek ‘choice of belief’ in contradistinction to ‘orthodox’ which comes from the Greek ‘right belief’. Heresy is to choose. Choose liberty, choose freedom, for the cause of freedom is the cause of humanity. We need to arm ourselves intellectually and morally for the battles ahead. This is a good place to start.
58 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 24 March 2024
Well written, very relevant
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 25 March 2024
A wonderful expose of the anti-liberal authoritarianism driving today's so-called culture wars. I love that O'Neill doesn't get sidetracked by the actual topics of culture-war debate. He doesn't try to convince the reader about anything - you won't find a discussion of whether or not trans women should be allowed in female changing rooms, or whether it is racist to be anti-white, etc - he just maintains a laser forms on one issue: free speech. An excellent read.
6 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 3 March 2024
Excellent book
Sadly a lot of bravery is required to write such a book about obvious matters

Thank God there are still people like him around

There is still hope!
6 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 10 July 2024
Focused, direct, passionate, flowing with choice examples, but above all, unafraid to say what needs to be said. No one has a monopoly on freedom of speech- no one has the right to tell you what you should think. No one should think for you,think for yourself. Bravo, bravo.
2 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 13 November 2023
I don’t agree with Brendan O’Neill on everything but even when we aren’t on the same page, so to speak, he is worth a read. If you are a heterodox thinker or just a person who is starting to doubt that the mainstream media is giving you the full picture this book is well with having in your collection.
3 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Claude Farley
5.0 out of 5 stars A masterpiece!
Reviewed in Canada on 21 May 2024
An audacious book with greats reflexions about our western civilisation!
Wagner Leal Arienti
5.0 out of 5 stars Leitura para quem está incorformado com a nova forma de censura.
Reviewed in Brazil on 2 September 2023
O título do livro preenche as expectativas. É um manifesto para a heresia e contra as novas formas de censura que se apresentam como politicamente corretas, mas que são a imposição de uma limitação à liberdade de expressão e de pensar. A leitura dos capítulos apresenta, de um lado, o poder opressor de visões dogmáticas com roupagem de politicamente corretas e de engenharia social para um suposto mundo melhor. De outro lado, é uma crítica à visão unilateral imposta por uma elite cultural, e apoiada pela elite econômica, pois virou um novo negócio, e um chamado para renovação de ideias herética.
Howard F. Jaeckel
5.0 out of 5 stars In this Era of Insanity, Heresy is Necessary
Reviewed in the United States on 30 June 2023
The New York Times often reverentially referred to as “The Newspaper of Record,” recently published a front-page story titled “When Students Change Gender Identity and Parents Don’t Know.” The story began by reporting the experience of a mother who learned that her biologically female teenager was, with the approval of her child’s school, using a male name and pronouns, a fact of which the mother had not been informed. Consistent with its use throughout the story of the words “he” and ‘his” in referring to the teenager, the article at one point noted that the student had requested “surgery to remove his breasts.”

Eye-catching, certainly, but not quite at the level of this classic in an earlier report about the issues faced by a biological girl when, in accordance with her gender identification, she used the boys’ bathroom: "There were practical issues. When he had his period, he wondered if he should revert to the girls’ bathroom, because there was no place to throw away his used tampons.”

At a time when a newspaper like the New York Times and many other mainstream institutions take a knee to this kind of insanity, we are in dire need of truth tellers to call them out. As shown in his new collection of essays, "A Heretic’s Manifesto," commonsense will find no more brilliant and cutting a champion in the face of such nonsense than Brendan O’Neil.

He begins by telling us that “[w]e need to talk about her penis.” Nothing, he says, better captures today’s irrationalism and its attendant authoritarianism than the commonplace use of this nonsensical phrase, not only in the fever swamps of the Internet but also in the respectable press. O’Neill cites multiple examples from the British press – and even from police reports and judicial proceedings -- that fully equal in their absurdity those that I have cited above. In several instances, they caused this reader to dissolve into laughter.

Although he is a very funny writer, O’Neill doesn’t think amusement is the right reaction to what he tells us. He recognizes, as did George Orwell, that language can be manipulated to limit and control thought. “Using people’s preferred pronouns, dutifully making a reference like her penis,” he writes, “are not mere acts of niceness but rather are signifiers of subservience to the disrupting ideology of transgenderism.” They sanctify “people’s subjective delusions over and above objective truth,” reflecting “the legion untruths we are all forced to labour under in this era of linguistic and moral tyranny.”

To those who might find this an overstatement of a peril imagined largely by conservatives, Mr. O’Neill counters that the ubiquity of a falsehood of such magnitude “confirms just how insidious the overhaul of speech and thought has become in our era.” He is correct. This is about more than “gender fluidity.”

It is the same post-modern malarkey that has caused the University of Arizona to issue a handbook titled “Diversity and Inclusiveness in the Classroom” asserting that classroom debate “must be an 'accessible space,'” and that “sharing should be based on one’s own feelings, experiences and perceptions.” The handbook discourages students from rebutting feelings that don’t jibe with verifiable reality. Should someone inadvertently challenge a student's feelings by citing factual evidence, the student whose emotions have thus been disrespected is encouraged to say “ouch.”

The same Wall Street Journal column reports that college debate competitions must now be preceded by a pre-debate "on the terms of engagement: whether students are required to cite proof or are free to argue wholly from their feelings and so-called “lived experience.”

Put aside that unless certain physical and mathematical truths are accepted, there will be no further progress in science and technology. How are we ever going to talk to each other about any public issue if we can't argue from evidence-based truth?

And beyond that, O’Neill says, requiring people to genuflect to such rubbish as the price of social acceptability is nothing less than totalitarian.

Early in "Nineteen Eighty-Four," Orwell’s protagonist, Winston Smith, writes this heretical thought in his secret journal: “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.”

And if that is denied – or if social pressure make us hesitant to say “he is he” and “she is she” – we are on the road to unfreedom.

O’Neill’s opening essay on ”Her Penis” is the best in "A Heretic’s Manifesto" and well reflects his view that such outlandish claptrap must be resisted, resolutely and unflinchingly, even if anodyne acceptance would be more socially convenient. But his eviscerations of climate catastrophizing, the Covid lockdown, white self-abnegation, unwarranted claims of “Islamophobia” and the hysterical reaction of transgender ideologues to feminists who stand up for women’s rights, are also bracing, and will delight at least those who share his outlook on these subjects.

Highly recommended.
21 people found this helpful
Report
Lottie
5.0 out of 5 stars Essential reading in these Orwellian times
Reviewed in Germany on 15 September 2023
This book should be required reading for young university students. It describes our times brilliantly and poignantly. Thank you, Brendan!
Steve
5.0 out of 5 stars Amazing!!!
Reviewed in Australia on 12 November 2023
I loved this book! Free speech at its core!