↓ Skip to main content

Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
442 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damien A. Fair, Joel T. Nigg, Swathi Iyer, Deepti Bathula, Kathryn L. Mills, Nico U. F. Dosenbach, Bradley L. Schlaggar, Maarten Mennes, David Gutman, Saroja Bangaru, Jan K. Buitelaar, Daniel P. Dickstein, Adriana Di Martino, David N. Kennedy, Clare Kelly, Beatriz Luna, Julie B. Schweitzer, Katerina Velanova, Yu-Feng Wang, Stewart Mostofsky, F. Xavier Castellanos, Michael P. Milham

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing enthusiasm that functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could achieve clinical utility for a broad range of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, several barriers remain. For example, the acquisition of large-scale datasets capable of clarifying the marked heterogeneity that exists in psychiatric illnesses will need to be realized. In addition, there continues to be a need for the development of image processing and analysis methods capable of separating signal from artifact. As a prototypical hyperkinetic disorder, and movement-related artifact being a significant confound in functional imaging studies, ADHD offers a unique challenge. As part of the ADHD-200 Global Competition and this special edition of Frontiers, the ADHD-200 Consortium demonstrates the utility of an aggregate dataset pooled across five institutions in addressing these challenges. The work aimed to (1) examine the impact of emerging techniques for controlling for "micro-movements," and (2) provide novel insights into the neural correlates of ADHD subtypes. Using support vector machine (SVM)-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) we show that functional connectivity patterns in individuals are capable of differentiating the two most prominent ADHD subtypes. The application of graph-theory revealed that the Combined (ADHD-C) and Inattentive (ADHD-I) subtypes demonstrated some overlapping (particularly sensorimotor systems), but unique patterns of atypical connectivity. For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex; in contrast, the ADHD-I group exhibited atypical patterns within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum. Systematic motion-related artifact was noted, and highlighted the need for stringent motion correction. Findings reported were robust to the specific motion correction strategy employed. These data suggest that resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) data can be used to characterize individual patients with ADHD and to identify neural distinctions underlying the clinical heterogeneity of ADHD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 3%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 441 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 24%
Researcher 100 21%
Student > Master 39 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Student > Bachelor 26 5%
Other 88 18%
Unknown 72 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 115 24%
Neuroscience 71 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 8%
Engineering 34 7%
Other 58 12%
Unknown 109 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,289,610
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#286
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,737
of 290,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#19
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.