Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    While I agree with what you've written (kinda), it sorta works the other way 'round. It's the contract text that comes first, and the pay office (payroll software) that must minimally meet those signed obligations. I've experienced negotiated changes to salaries made minutes before signatures were added to contracts. The pay office staff were "the last to know" what the outcome was to be...
    – Fe2O3
    Commented Jul 4 at 11:52
  • 5
    @Fe2O3 I get what you are saying, but you are probably starting from the position of having a decent payroll system. My key point is that if your payroll isn't adding up correctly, your local Tax collectors are going to make your life VERY interesting, and they won't give a damn about your employee contracts.
    – MikeB
    Commented Jul 4 at 16:19
  • 1
    Yeah, running a business isn't a walk in the park on a sunny day...
    – Fe2O3
    Commented Jul 4 at 18:26
  • 1
    Yes, this is the sanest approach. Then provide the 'negotiators' with a chart of hourly to annual, or show them how to multiply by 2080 or whatever. Yes, the annual total doesn't end with a bunch of zeros, complain to the Calendar Deities. Commented Jul 5 at 12:09