Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

14
  • 6
    I don't think you can legally have a contract that only states an approximate salary. You could state an exact hourly rate and the write 'this comes to approximately $45000 a year' but only stating an approximate amount almost certainly doesn't work.
    – quarague
    Commented Jul 3 at 6:47
  • 3
    @quarague Thank you for pointing that out. I'd thought the preceding phrase, "based on hours worked in each pay period" indicated that any annual amount must be only a courtesy approximation calculated for the reader.
    – Fe2O3
    Commented Jul 3 at 7:43
  • 2
    @Fe2O3 i can confirm that what you actually wrote, indeed, states that :) the best answer here.
    – Fattie
    Commented Jul 3 at 19:43
  • 2
    A year not fitting into an even number of weeks can cause more fun than just the 1 day variance. If you're paid (every other) week it can result in years with an extra pay period. About 15 years ago that happened at the company I worked for; and there was a lot of angst in the office rumor mill that management was considering dividing our annual salary and leave accrual rates into 27 chunks instead of 26. If I ever knew if that was under serious consideration by the powers that be, I've since forgotten. We were given 27 pays that year (and the matching extra hours of PTO). Commented Jul 4 at 18:27
  • 2
    Months should be 4 weeks. There should be 13 of them. The extra day or two at the end is a holiday and isn't counted in. Every year should start on a Monday. Done. Commented Jul 4 at 21:24