2006
DOI: 10.3758/cabn.6.4.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures

Abstract: Cognitive strategies such as reappraisal reduce the intensity of negative experience and brain activity that is sensitive to emotional salience. The time course of reappraisal-related neural modulation remains unclear, and it is unknown whether the electrocortical response to emotional stimuli is sensitive to reappraisal. Event-related brain potentials were recorded first while participants passively viewed pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures, and then during an emotion regulation block in which partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

62
507
15
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(594 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
62
507
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the effect size of the contrasts was larger for suppression than for attend, F = 14.83 and F = 5.58, respectively. This result is consistent with previous research (Hajcak & Nieuwenhuis, 2006) showing that reappraisal inhibits emotion-related ERPs. It also suggests that the emotion-related P2 is facilitated during suppression for low-TAS individuals, consistent with our overall results in the suppression condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the effect size of the contrasts was larger for suppression than for attend, F = 14.83 and F = 5.58, respectively. This result is consistent with previous research (Hajcak & Nieuwenhuis, 2006) showing that reappraisal inhibits emotion-related ERPs. It also suggests that the emotion-related P2 is facilitated during suppression for low-TAS individuals, consistent with our overall results in the suppression condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…2 Scalp maps of mean amplitude differences between negative and neutral conditions plotted for the P2 and N2 components and the 400-to 600-ms time window in those low in TAS during the suppression condition. Maxima and minima are specific to each scalp map thought to reflect overt, postperceptual emotional appraisal processes Schupp, Junghofer, et al, 2004), and previous research has shown that it can be reduced by effective emotion regulation (e.g., Hajcak & Nieuwenhuis, 2006). However, the strongest effects in our study were found in early ERPs to emotion and, in particular, the P2/N2 complex.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Specifically, expressive inhibitory processing might be associated with enhanced P3 amplitudes in central-frontal regions [2830]; while the timing features of emotional responding is probably reflected by the LPP amplitudes varying as a function of regulation strategy [9,33,34]. Therefore, we predict that subjective experience of negative emotion is positively correlated with LPP amplitudes, and the self-reported levels of suppression should be positively related to central-frontal P3 amplitudes during expressive suppression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Baseline correction considered the average voltage of 100 ms as the prestimulus interval. Because the early window of the LPP is maximally expressed at more posterior scalp locations (Foti & Hacjak, 2008;Hajcak & Nieuwenhuis, 2006;Olofsson, Nordin, Sequeira & Polich, 2008) we conducted an ANOVA that focused on Cz and Pz electrodes, as a cluster. Specifically, ERPs were constructed by averaging trials as a function of the following factors: 2 (anxiety trait: LTA and HTA) x 2 (context: fictitious and real) x 2 (stimulus valence: neutral and unpleasant).…”
Section: Event Related Potential Recording and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%