2019
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2018.00252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paravian Phylogeny and the Dinosaur-Bird Transition: An Overview

Abstract: Recent years witnessed the discovery of a great diversity of early birds as well as closely related non-avian theropods, which modified previous conceptions about the origin of birds and their flight. We here present a review of the taxonomic composition and main anatomical characteristics of those theropod families closely related with early birds, with the aim of analyzing and discussing the main competing hypotheses pertaining to avian origins. We reject the postulated troodontid affinities of anchiornithin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
42
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
(513 reference statements)
7
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of avian flight origins based on these taxa may be misinterpreting the sequence of character acquisition that resulted in crown avian flight. The embedding of putatively flighted Rahonavis, Archaeopteryx (though see Agnolin et al, 2019), and Microraptor within clades that lack evidence of aerial locomotion is consistent with prior studies that found the morphology of most non-avialan paravians as functionally more similar to terrestrial birds and mammals than arboreal ones (Dececchi & Larsson, 2011; Agnolin et al, 2019). This supports a non-volant terrestrial ecomorph as the basal condition for the major paravian clades, supporting numerous previous studies demonstrating that key flight preadaptations up to and including vaned feathers and well-developed wings evolved in terrestrial contexts millions of years prior to the origin of crown avian flight (Makovicky & Zanno, 2011; Brusatte et al, 2014; Dececchi, Larsson & Habib, 2016; Cau, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Models of avian flight origins based on these taxa may be misinterpreting the sequence of character acquisition that resulted in crown avian flight. The embedding of putatively flighted Rahonavis, Archaeopteryx (though see Agnolin et al, 2019), and Microraptor within clades that lack evidence of aerial locomotion is consistent with prior studies that found the morphology of most non-avialan paravians as functionally more similar to terrestrial birds and mammals than arboreal ones (Dececchi & Larsson, 2011; Agnolin et al, 2019). This supports a non-volant terrestrial ecomorph as the basal condition for the major paravian clades, supporting numerous previous studies demonstrating that key flight preadaptations up to and including vaned feathers and well-developed wings evolved in terrestrial contexts millions of years prior to the origin of crown avian flight (Makovicky & Zanno, 2011; Brusatte et al, 2014; Dececchi, Larsson & Habib, 2016; Cau, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We investigated dental features on teeth preserved within the upper and lower jaws as well as isolated teeth belonging to a total of 198 taxa bracketed phylogenetically between the basal saurischian Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis (Reig, 1963;Sereno and Novas, 1994) and the basal avialan Archaeopteryx lithographica (Godefroit et al, 2013a;Foth et al, 2014;Lefèvre et al, 2017; Appendix 1.1). The basal saurischians Daemonosaurus (Sues et al, 2011), Eodromaeus (Martínez et al, 2011) and Eoraptor (Sereno et al, 1993(Sereno et al, , 2013, as well as the Scansoriopterygidae (Czerkas and Yuan, 2002) and the Anchiornithinae (sensu Agnolin et al, 2019; 'Anchiornithidae' of 'Anchiorninae' of Hu et al, 2018), recently recovered as non-avialan theropods by some authors (Sues et al, 2011;Brusatte et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2015bXu et al, , 2017Cau et al, 2017;Müller et al, 2018;Hu et al, 2018), were also included in this study. Of these 200 taxa, we examined firsthand the dentition of 125 taxa deposited in 35 scientific collections from Argentina, France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Qatar, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, South Africa, China, Canada and the United States (Appendix 1.1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow the phylogenetic framework proposed by Agnolín and Novas (2013); (see also Agnolín and Novas, 2011;Agnolín et al, 2019;Motta et al, 2020) in which Deinonychosauria is interpreted as a non-monophyletic group, and Dromaeosauridae is formed by Velociraptor, Dromaeosaurus, Deinonychus, and taxa more closely related to them than to Microraptor, Unenlagia, Rahonavis or Archaeopteryx. Microraptoria and Unenlagiidae are interpreted to form successively closer relatives of the clade Avialae (Figure 1).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our interpretative scheme about the phylogenetic relationships among basal paravians departs from others (e.g., Norell and Clarke, 2001;Makovicky et al, 2005;Xu and Kim, 2011;Turner et al, 2012;Gianechini et al, 2017;Lefèvre et al, 2017;Pei et al, 2017;Hartman et al, 2019;Cau, 2020;Pei et al, 2020) in that we propose that Troodontidae, Dromaeosauridae, Microraptoria, Unenlagiidae and Anchiornithidae form successively closer relatives of Avialae. We choose to follow this scheme, because a detailed overview of other phylogenetic analyses (e.g., TWIG) resulted in poorly resolved phylogenetic relationships among derived paravians (Agnolín et al, 2019).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%