2019
DOI: 10.47611/jsr.v8i2.820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative and Positive Reappraisal After a Romantic Break-Up

Abstract: This study compared negative reappraisal of an ex-partner and positive reappraisal of a situation after a break-up. Negative reappraisal was expected to reduce love, increase unpleasantness, reduce upsetness about the break-up, and reduce motivated attention to the ex-partner as measured by the late positive potential (LPP) compared to positive reappraisal. In this study, twenty-four participants who were upset about a break-up viewed pictures of their ex-partner in two reappraisal conditions and a no reapprai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-five participants (7 men, M = 34.2 years, SD = 8.9, range = 22–57) were recruited from the University of Missouri – St. Louis, Craigslist, and through researchmatch.org. This sample size was based on previous studies about love regulation, both of which had 24 participants (Horner & Langeslag, 2019; Langeslag & Sanchez, 2018). A sensitivity power analysis using MorePower 6.0.4 (Campbell & Thompson, 2012) revealed that a sample size of 25 yields 80% power to detect large effects (η p 2 = .26 for both the main effect of Regulation and the Picture × Regulation interaction) in a 2 × 2 repeated measures analysis of variance (rmANOVA) with an α level of .05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-five participants (7 men, M = 34.2 years, SD = 8.9, range = 22–57) were recruited from the University of Missouri – St. Louis, Craigslist, and through researchmatch.org. This sample size was based on previous studies about love regulation, both of which had 24 participants (Horner & Langeslag, 2019; Langeslag & Sanchez, 2018). A sensitivity power analysis using MorePower 6.0.4 (Campbell & Thompson, 2012) revealed that a sample size of 25 yields 80% power to detect large effects (η p 2 = .26 for both the main effect of Regulation and the Picture × Regulation interaction) in a 2 × 2 repeated measures analysis of variance (rmANOVA) with an α level of .05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some people think that love regulation is difficult or even impossible [25,28]. People think that other people are better at love regulation than they are, that who they are in love with is less controllable than love intensity, and that infatuation is even less controllable than attachment and sexual desire [10,28,51,52]. Nevertheless, a series of studies have shown that people can control different types of love using behavioral and cognitive strategies.…”
Section: Romantic Love Is Not Uncontrollablementioning
confidence: 99%