[citation report] Effect of Different Types of Face Masks on the Ventilatory and Cardiovascular Response to Maximal-Intensity Exercise

Cited by 6 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The initial search identified 4,587 studies in all combined databases. In the full-text stage, 69 studies were eligible, and in the end, 34 studies ( Zimmerman et al, 1991 ; Roberge et al, 2010 ; Roberge et al, 2012a ; Roberge et al, 2012b ; Chen et al, 2016 ; Kim et al, 2016 ; Person et al, 2018 ; Fikenzer et al, 2020 ; Lässing et al, 2020 ; Morris et al, 2020 ; Wong et al, 2020 ; Ade et al, 2021 ; Bar-On et al, 2021 ; Dantas et al, 2021 ; Doherty et al, 2021 ; Driver et al, 2021 ; Egger et al, 2021 ; Epstein et al, 2021 ; Fukushi et al, 2021 ; Kampert et al, 2021 ; Mapelli et al, 2021 ; Modena et al, 2021 ; Reychler et al, 2021 ; Rojo-Tirado et al, 2021 ; Ryu and Jong-Geun, 2021 ; Slimani et al, 2021 ; Tornero-Aguilera et al, 2021 ; Yoshihara et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2021 ; Cabanillas-Barea et al, 2022 ; Jesus et al, 2022 ; Ng et al, 2022 ; Rosa et al, 2022 ; Steinhilber et al, 2022 ) met all the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Two additional studies ( Shaw et al, 2020 ; Otsuka et al, 2022 ) were found from other sources (e.g., references from included studies, and publications founded in other reviews).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All studies presented a control condition (i.e., no face mask wearing). The samples were composed mostly by healthy ( Zimmerman et al, 1991 ; Roberge et al, 2010 ; Roberge et al, 2012a ; Roberge et al, 2012b ; Chen et al, 2016 ; Kim et al, 2016 ; Person et al, 2018 ; Lässing et al, 2020 ; Morris et al, 2020 ; Bar-On et al, 2021 ; Doherty et al, 2021 ; Driver et al, 2021 ; Fukushi et al, 2021 ; Mapelli et al, 2021 ; Reychler et al, 2021 ; Ryu and Jong-Geun, 2021 ; Slimani et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2021 ; Cabanillas-Barea et al, 2022 ; Jesus et al, 2022 ; Steinhilber et al, 2022 ), healthy physically active ( Fikenzer et al, 2020 ; Shaw et al, 2020 ; Wong et al, 2020 ; Ade et al, 2021 ; Epstein et al, 2021 ; Kampert et al, 2021 ; Yoshihara et al, 2021 ), healthy trained ( Rojo-Tirado et al, 2021 ; Ng et al, 2022 ) resistance-trained ( Rosa et al, 2022 ), and healthy sedentary ( Otsuka et al, 2022 ) adults; athletes ( Dantas et al, 2021 ; Egger et al, 2021 ; Tornero-Aguilera et al, 2021 ) and amateur soccer players ( Modena et al, 2021 ). The sample size varied from six ( Otsuka et al, 2022 ) to 72 ( Tornero-Aguilera et al, 2021 ) participants per condition.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sample size varied from six ( Otsuka et al, 2022 ) to 72 ( Tornero-Aguilera et al, 2021 ) participants per condition. Some studies ( n = 10) ( Person et al, 2018 ; Shaw et al, 2020 ; Ade et al, 2021 ; Bar-On et al, 2021 ; Driver et al, 2021 ; Reychler et al, 2021 ; Rojo-Tirado et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2021 ; Ng et al, 2022 ; Steinhilber et al, 2022 ) determined the sample size based on sample calculation. A total of 749 participants: 460 men and 289 women; with a mean age of 27 years old, were evaluated across all studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Facial mask acute effects on affective/psychological and exercise performance responses during exercise: A meta-analytical review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Face masks are widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic as one of the protective measures against the viral infection risk. Some evidence suggests that face mask prolonged use can be uncomfortable, and discomfort can be exacerbated during exercise. However, the acute responses of mask-wearing during exercise on affective/psychological and exercise performance responses is still a topic of debate.Purpose: To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis of the acute effects of mask-wearing during exercise on affective/psychological and exercise performance responses in healthy adults of different/diverse training status.Methods: This review (CRD42021249569) was performed according to Cochrane’s recommendations, with searches performed in electronic (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, SportDiscus, and PsychInfo) and pre-print databases (MedRxiv, SportRxiv, PsyArXiv, and Preprint.Org). Syntheses of included studies’ data were performed, and the RoB-2 tool was used to assess the studies’ methodological quality. Assessed outcomes were affective/psychological (discomfort, stress and affective responses, fatigue, anxiety, dyspnea, and perceived exertion) and exercise performance time-to-exhaustion (TTE), maximal power output (POMAX), and muscle force production] parameters. Available data were pooled through meta-analyses.Results: Initially 4,587 studies were identified, 36 clinical trials (all crossover designs) were included. A total of 749 (39% women) healthy adults were evaluated across all studies. The face mask types found were clothing (CM), surgical (SM), FFP2/N95, and exhalation valved FFP2/N95, while the most common exercises were treadmill and cycle ergometer incremental tests, beyond outdoor running, resistance exercises and functional tests. Mask-wearing during exercise lead to increased overall discomfort (SMD: 0.87; 95% CI 0.25–1.5; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%), dyspnea (SMD: 0.40; 95% CI 0.09–0.71; p = 0.01; I2 = 68%), and perceived exertion (SMD: 0.38; 95% CI 0.18–0.58; p < 0.001; I2 = 46%); decreases on the TTE (SMD: −0.29; 95% CI −0.10 to −0.48; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%); without effects on POMAX and walking/running distance traveled (p > 0.05).Conclusion: Face mask wearing during exercise increases discomfort (large effect), dyspnea (moderate effect), and perceived exertion (small effect), and reduces the TTE (small effect), without effects on cycle ergometer POMAX and distance traveled in walking and running functional tests. However, some aspects may be dependent on the face mask type, such as dyspnea and perceived exertion.Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021249569], identifier [CRD42021249569].

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Facial mask acute effects on affective/psychological and exercise performance responses during exercise: A meta-analytical review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Firstly, the virus and its complex pathophysiology were evaluated in some of the published articles [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 22 , 29 ]. In addition, the importance of face masks and related subjects were highlighted in other studies [ 6 , 7 ]. Klugar and colleagues asserted the importance of vaccines and different types of vaccines in combatting the pandemic [ 10 ].…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

“…However, it has also opened many doors to the new development of novel technologies, such as telemedicine. In this context, the editors of the journal Biology decided at the very beginning of this worldwide dilemma to create a Special Issue, entitled “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).” This Special Issue encompasses thirty-one articles covering various aspects of the current pandemic [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. With contributions from esteemed scientists from across the globe, this Special Issue sheds light on various aspects of the pandemic, including, but not limited to, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, and possible treatment options.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Goldust

2022

Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases

Benito

Gutiérrez

Rojo-Tirado

2023

Sci Rep

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The real protection offered by facemasks to control the transmission of respiratory viruses is still undetermined. Most of the manufacturing regulations, as well as scientific studies, have focused on studying the filtration capacity of the fabrics from which they are made, ignoring the air that escapes through the facial misalignments, and which depends on the respiratory frequencies and volumes. The objective of this work was to define a Real Bacterial Filtration Efficiency for each type of facemask, considering the bacterial filtration efficiency of the manufacturers and the air that passes through them. Nine different facemasks were tested on a mannequin with three gas analyzers (measuring inlet, outlet, and leak volumes) inside a polymethylmethacrylate box. In addition, the differential pressure was measured to determine the resistance offered by the facemasks during the inhalation and exhalation processes. Air was introduced with a manual syringe for 180 s simulating inhalations and exhalations at rest, light, moderate and vigorous activities (10, 60, 80 and 120 L/min, respectively). Statistical analysis showed that practically half of the air entering to the system is not filtered by the facemasks in all intensities (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.971). They also showed that the hygienic facemasks filter more than 70% of the air, and their filtration does not depend on the simulated intensity, while the rest of the facemasks show an evidently different response, influenced by the amount of air mobilized. Therefore, the Real Bacterial Filtration Efficiency can be calculated as a modulation of the Bacterial Filtration Efficiencies that depends on the type of facemask. The real filtration capacity of the facemasks has been overestimated during last years since the filtration of the fabrics is not the real filtration when the facemask is worn.

show abstract

Effect of Different Types of Face Masks on the Ventilatory and Cardiovascular Response to Maximal-Intensity Exercise

Cited by 6 publications

References 31 publications

Facial mask acute effects on affective/psychological and exercise performance responses during exercise: A meta-analytical review

Facial mask acute effects on affective/psychological and exercise performance responses during exercise: A meta-analytical review

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About