[citation report] An Innovative, Paradigm-Shifting Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Glucose Excursions With the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Educate, Motivate, and Activate Adults With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Pilot Feasibility Study

Cited by 9 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…31 Two studies provided short message service (SMS) for tailored feedback as dietary alerts and reminders, 27 or for educational tips about dietary intake. 28 Three studies applied real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) 20,30 or blinded CGM 23 with sessions on reducing carbohydrate intake and providing substitutions.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…18 However, these two-arm studies did not show significant change in eating habits. 24 Of the five single-group interventions, 17,19,29 -31 four resulted in a significant reduction in HbA1c 19,29 -31 and BMI 29 -31 or weight, 17 others resulted in improved in healthy dietary habits, 31 reduced in consumption of food portion size, 31 carbohydrate, 30,31 protein and fat, 31 and improved dietary self-efficacy, 19,31 diabetes distress, 30 and depression. 30…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among 15 reviewed studies, four were conducted in the United States, 19,23,24,30 seven were in Asia, 15,18,[25][26][27][28][29] two were in Australia, 17,20 and two were in Europe. 22,31 The sample sizes ranged from 10 to 800.…”

Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the three studies that reported on race, the percentage of non-white participants ranged from 15% to 47.6%. 23,24,30 A total of 35.5% to 100.0% participants took oral antihyperglycemic medication, 19,15,22,25,26,28,29,31 11.8% to 37.8% participants injected insulin, 22,25,29,31 and 23.5% to 30% had mixed oral medication and insulin. 25,26 A total of six studies reported the duration of diabetes, ranging from 2.6 to 13.7 y 15,19,23,27,29,31 Among 15 reviewed studies, a total of eight studies were two-arm RCT intervention, 15,20,22,23,[25][26][27][28] two studies were two-arm quasi-experimental studies, 18,24 and five studies were single-group intervention.…”

Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…25,26 A total of six studies reported the duration of diabetes, ranging from 2.6 to 13.7 y 15,19,23,27,29,31 Among 15 reviewed studies, a total of eight studies were two-arm RCT intervention, 15,20,22,23,[25][26][27][28] two studies were two-arm quasi-experimental studies, 18,24 and five studies were single-group intervention. 17,19,[29][30][31] A total of 12 studies lasted less than or equal to three months, 15,[17][18][19][20][23][24][25][26][29][30][31] and three lasted 12 months. 22,27,28…”

Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Dietary Self-Management Using Mobile Health Technology for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review

Zheng¹,

Rice²,

Melkus³

et al. 2023

J Diabetes Sci Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Dietary self-management is one key component to achieve optimal glycemic control. Advances in mobile health (mHealth) technology have reduced the burden of diabetes self-management; however, limited evidence has been known regarding the status of the current body of research using mHealth technology for dietary management for adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Literature searches were conducted electronically using PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), and Scopus. Keywords and subject headings covered dietary management, type 2 diabetes, and mHealth. Inclusion criteria included studies that applied mHealth for dietary self-management for adults with type 2 diabetes and were published in English as full articles. Results: This review (N = 15 studies) revealed heterogeneity of the mHealth-based dietary self-management or interventions and reported results related to physiological, dietary behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Twelve studies applied smartphone apps with varied functions for dietary management or intervention, while three studies applied continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to guide dietary changes. Among 15 reviewed studies, only three of them were two-arm randomized clinical trial (RCT) with larger sample and 12-month study duration and 12 of them were pilot testing. Nine of 12 pilot studies showed improved HbA1c; most of them resulted in varied dietary changes; and few of them showed improved diabetes distress and depression. Conclusion: Our review provided evidence that the application of mHealth technology for dietary intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes is still in pilot testing. The preliminary effects are inconclusive on physiological, dietary behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes.

show abstract