2021
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differential impact of size mismatch in live versus deceased donor kidney transplant

Abstract: Background The impact of weight mismatch between donors and recipients (D‐R) undergoing living‐donor kidney transplant (LDKT) versus weight‐matched deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) is not established. Aim To determine whether absolute weight mismatch between D‐R affects graft survival following LDKT and how this relates to graft outcomes with DDKT when D‐R are weight matched. Materials & Methods We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis demonstrates an attenuation of the protective effects of a larger donor than recipient ( 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 55 ) when either the donor or recipient is obese. This finding may similarly be explained by the nephron underdosing hypothesis ( 39 , 56 ) whereby the relatively smaller renal mass in smaller donors results in increased single nephron glomerular filtration rate and increased risk of hyperfiltration injury over time ( 34 , 38 , 57 , 58 , 59 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our analysis demonstrates an attenuation of the protective effects of a larger donor than recipient ( 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 55 ) when either the donor or recipient is obese. This finding may similarly be explained by the nephron underdosing hypothesis ( 39 , 56 ) whereby the relatively smaller renal mass in smaller donors results in increased single nephron glomerular filtration rate and increased risk of hyperfiltration injury over time ( 34 , 38 , 57 , 58 , 59 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A secondary exposure was combined donor and/or recipient obesity and DR weight mismatch. We categorized DR absolute weight difference as >30 kg, 10-30 kg (donor < recipient, D<R; or donor > recipient, D>R) and <10 kg (D = R) as per previous literature ( 19 ), stratified by the four aforementioned DR obesity pairings (NOD-NOR, OD-NOR, NOD-OR and OD-OR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior studies have evaluated size mismatch between the recipient and donor on the basis of body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), and weight (2,3,8,9). These parameters have been used as surrogates for discrepancies in kidney size and/ or nephron mass in the recipient-donor pair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender differences are also an important factor to consider when assessing size mismatch (8,9,17,18). We found that the influence of height discrepancies persisted within different combinations of donor-recipient genders in a predictable pattern just as in the overall cohort of DD and LD transplants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%