2017
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care 12 Months After Stopping Interventions

Abstract: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing contributes to antibiotic resistance and leads to adverse events. 1 A clusterrandomized trial of 3 behavioral interventions 2 intended to reduce inappropriate prescribing found that 2 of the 3 interventions were effective. 3 This study examines the persistence of effects 12 months after stopping the interventions.Methods | We randomized 47 primary care practices in Boston, Massachusetts, and Los Angeles, California, and enrolled 248 clinicians to receive 0, 1, 2, or 3 inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
88
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(9 reference statements)
4
88
3
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Effects in the present study were smaller than those of other promising behavioral interventions on prescribing that targeted a more limited number of health care professionals (eg, where a peer comparison message reduced inappropriate antibiotic prescribing by 22% and effects endured after the intervention 23 ), although those interventions involved more complex changes, such as modifying electronic health record systems. 22,23,34 The findings herein also contrast with the null effect of a similar intervention performed by several members of our study team targeting high prescribers of controlled substances, including opioids. 25 The present study incorporated lessons from that work that could have contributed to the more substantial effect we observed here.…”
Section: Research Original Investigationcontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…24 Effects in the present study were smaller than those of other promising behavioral interventions on prescribing that targeted a more limited number of health care professionals (eg, where a peer comparison message reduced inappropriate antibiotic prescribing by 22% and effects endured after the intervention 23 ), although those interventions involved more complex changes, such as modifying electronic health record systems. 22,23,34 The findings herein also contrast with the null effect of a similar intervention performed by several members of our study team targeting high prescribers of controlled substances, including opioids. 25 The present study incorporated lessons from that work that could have contributed to the more substantial effect we observed here.…”
Section: Research Original Investigationcontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…There is evidence both in the medical literature and in economic theory to support using a package of feedback, nudges, and peer comparisons to improve prescribing outcomes. This has been shown to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care, and in one study of peer comparisons in outpatient clinics and doctor's offices, these improvements were sustained for at least 12 months after the interventions were completed …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These interventions are considered core components of successful antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). Other types of interventions, including behavioral change interventions, and peer comparisons have been described as a mechanism to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, however data is largely limited to the primary care setting . In January 2017, we began to provide standardized prescriber‐specific antibiotic report cards that focused on FQ utilization across our 16‐facility community hospital system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other types of interventions, including behavioral change interventions, and peer comparisons have been described as a mechanism to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, however data is largely limited to the primary care setting. [4][5][6][7] In January 2017, we began to provide standardized prescriber-specific antibiotic report cards that focused on FQ utilization across our 16-facility community hospital system. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of peer comparison reports on overall FQ utilization patterns among inpatient prescribers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%