2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-016-9603-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of immediate and prolonged effects of cognitive reappraisal and distraction on emotional experience

Abstract: length: 250 words AbstractCognitive emotion regulation strategies are important components of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Additionally, up-regulation and difficulties in the down-regulation of negative feelings are associated with mental disorders. However, little is known about the lasting effects of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on emotional experience and associated neural activation. Therefore, this study investigated immediate and prolonged effects of emotion regulation using cognitive r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For distraction, activation was observed in the dlPFC, anterior insula, and the angular gyrus/supramarginal gyrus region. These results are in line with previous findings, except for the lack of the previously observed vlPFC/IFG activity (Hermann, Kress, & Stark, 2017;McRae et al, 2010). Nevertheless, the observed decreases in negative self-reports, in conjunction with the observation of several other distraction-related regions, suggest that distraction was still efficacious as a cognitive emotion regulation strategy in this context.…”
Section: Implications For Distractionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For distraction, activation was observed in the dlPFC, anterior insula, and the angular gyrus/supramarginal gyrus region. These results are in line with previous findings, except for the lack of the previously observed vlPFC/IFG activity (Hermann, Kress, & Stark, 2017;McRae et al, 2010). Nevertheless, the observed decreases in negative self-reports, in conjunction with the observation of several other distraction-related regions, suggest that distraction was still efficacious as a cognitive emotion regulation strategy in this context.…”
Section: Implications For Distractionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous neuroimaging studies on distraction have found that the implementation of this strategy to down-regulate negative emotions resulted in the expected decreases in selfreports of negative affect and that these behavioral decreases were associated with decreases in brain activity in the amygdala (Hermann, Kress, & Stark, 2017;McRae et al, 2010). Distraction also led to significant increases in activation in left vlPFC, right lateral PFC, as well as superior parietal cortex.…”
Section: Distractionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, it is significant that savoring persisted to increase the LPP elicited by pictures presented 20 min later (i.e., this is not something that happens in every task). Nonetheless, given recent evidence that other emotion regulation techniques, such as reappraisal, can persist up to 24 hr later (Denny et al., 2015; Hermann et al., 2017), future research may wish to explore the extent of this lasting effect over longer periods of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive reappraisal, one of the most important cognitive strategies of emotion regulation, aims to reinterpret the meaning of an emotional event or stimulus (Buhle et al, 2014; Foti & Hajcak, 2008; Gross & John, 2003; Hajcak & Nieuwenhuis, 2006; Ochsner & Gross, 2005). Reappraisal appears to be highly effective in down‐regulating the experience of negative emotions with few cognitive and physiological costs (Gross, 1998, 2002; Hermann, Kress, & Stark, 2017; Ochsner, Silvers, & Buhle, 2012; Shafir, Schwartz, Blechert, & Sheppes, 2015; Silvers, Buhle, Ochsner, & Silvers, 2013). The effects of reappraisal aimed to decrease negative emotions are reflected behaviorally in the reduction of self‐reported negative experience (Staudinger, Erk, Abler, & Walter, 2009; Wager, Davidson, Hughes, Lindquist, & Ochsner, 2008), that is, reduced unpleasantness of, and arousal associated with, negative stimuli (Foti & Hajcak, 2008; Hajcak & Nieuwenhuis, 2006; Thiruchselvam, Blechert, Sheppes, Rydstrom, & Gross, 2011; Van Cauwenberge, Leeuwen, Hoppenbrouwers, & Wiersema, 2017; Yuan, Zhou, & Hu, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%