2016
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.5498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Sleep Efficiency: What Should the Denominator Be?

Abstract: Inconsistency in operationally defining sleep efficiency (SE) creates confusion with regard to the conceptualization and use of the construct by researchers and clinicians. The source of the inconsistency is the denominator of the widely published operational definition of SE: ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage). When taken literally, TIB includes non-sleep-related activity (e.g., reading, texting, conversing with a partner, watching television) both p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
147
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
6
147
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding actigraphy, sleep efficiency was the only measure to yield significant whole‐brain regression findings, controlling for primary diagnosis. Sleep efficiency, commonly defined as the ratio of sleep duration to time spent in bed, plays a central role in insomnia (Reed & Sacco, ), which is consistent with the type of sleep difficulty observed in our patient sample. In contrast to the PSQI global score where high scores denote worse sleep, high sleep efficiency values signify better sleep.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding actigraphy, sleep efficiency was the only measure to yield significant whole‐brain regression findings, controlling for primary diagnosis. Sleep efficiency, commonly defined as the ratio of sleep duration to time spent in bed, plays a central role in insomnia (Reed & Sacco, ), which is consistent with the type of sleep difficulty observed in our patient sample. In contrast to the PSQI global score where high scores denote worse sleep, high sleep efficiency values signify better sleep.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding actigraphy, sleep efficiency was the only measure to yield significant whole-brain regression findings, controlling for primary diagnosis. Sleep efficiency, commonly defined as the ratio of sleep duration to time spent in bed, plays a central role in insomnia (Reed & Sacco, 2016), which is consistent with the type of sleep difficulty Broadly, the DACC is part of a network encompassing cognitive, motor (i.e., action) execution, and related functional systems (Bush, Luu, & Posner, 2000;Etkin et al, 2011). Relevant to our findings is the role DACC plays in automatic and controlled processes that underlie cognitive control (Shenhav, Botvinick, & Cohen, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…That is a simple, but important, problem, as sleep efficiency has been found to be a crucial sleep parameter with important health consequences [38,43,44]. Furthermore, we did not quantify in our prediction the overall sleep efficiency but simply the differentiation between two classes (poor versus good sleep efficiency).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those achieving a sleep efficiency score of ≥85% are thought to be good-quality sleepers, and those with a score of <85% are thought to have poor-quality sleep [38]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SE% refers to the total time in bed spent asleep, and is calculated as the ratio of reported nocturnal sleep duration and time in bed times 100 to yield a percentage. SE% should be kept steady between 85% and 90% (Reed andSacco, 2015, Shrivastava et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sleep Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%