2015
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of treatment and mammography detection on breast cancer survival over time: 1990‐2007

Abstract: Background It is not known to what extent improvement over time in breast cancer survival is related to earlier detection by mammography or to more effective treatments. Methods At our comprehensive cancer care center we conducted a retrospective cohort study of women ages 50–69 years diagnosed with invasive stage I–III breast cancer and followed over three time periods: 1990–1994, 1995–1999 and 2000–2007. Data was chart abstracted on detection method, diagnosis, treatment, and follow up for vital status in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
43
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Women are being treated successfully and surviving longer [2], so issues relating to quality of life and adjustment are becoming increasingly important [3], especially for women who are diagnosed through these screening programmes. Psychological distress is a common response to breast cancer, with women reporting clinical levels of anxiety and depression [4, 5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women are being treated successfully and surviving longer [2], so issues relating to quality of life and adjustment are becoming increasingly important [3], especially for women who are diagnosed through these screening programmes. Psychological distress is a common response to breast cancer, with women reporting clinical levels of anxiety and depression [4, 5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer in women, with over 1.38 million women diagnosed worldwide in 2008, accounting for 23% of all new cancer cases . Owing to the availability of national screening programs, more women are being diagnosed, and mortality from the disease has reduced . Despite these benefits, research has also focused on the costs of possible screening outcomes, for example, the impact of overdiagnosis and false‐positive results .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De fato, há estudos que mostram que 12-30% dos cânceres de mama têm origem principalmente genética e são de herança autossômica dominante, resultado da mutação de vários genes, dentre os quais se destacam o BRCA1, BRCA2 e RAD50. 5,24 Apesar de haver o predomínio das mulheres participantes negarem casos de câncer de mama na família, o conhecimento sobre a importância deste fator de risco comprova que está sendo amplamente difundido. Além disso, fatores relacionados ao estilo de vida, em especial a obesidade, e o uso de álcool e tabaco foram também citados pela maioria das pesquisadas, mostrando que o conhecimento sobre os principais fatores de risco não parece ser um fator limitante para a adesão ao programa.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…[2][3] Estudos recentes apontam que os incrementos na incidência do câncer de mama podem estar relacionados ao aumento da expectativa de vida, ao processo de urbanização e de industrialização bem como à melhora da tecnologia diagnóstica e a ampliação de programas de rastreamento. [4][5][6] No entanto, tendências de aumento de incidência e morte refletem diferenças nos padrões de fatores de risco, acesso e disponibilidade à detecção precoce e tratamento oportuno. Relatos da associação entre altos índices de mortalidade, diagnóstico tardio e assistência médica incipiente, têm sido amplamente divulgados e parecem ser frequentes nos países em desenvolvimento.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified