Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • $\begingroup$ Non FV schemes still are conservative. You just need to use a conservative method. For example the edge-based discretization which is commonly referred to as node-centered finite volume is actually a finite difference scheme. It maintains conservation because it still uses a flux balance. There are conservative FD, FV, and FE discretizations. $\endgroup$
    – EMP
    Commented Jul 5, 2022 at 17:30
  • $\begingroup$ My understanding is that FV methods are the subset of FD methods that are conserving. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2022 at 22:00
  • $\begingroup$ That is not correct. FD is solving the strong form, FV and FEM the weak form. $\endgroup$
    – EMP
    Commented Jul 6, 2022 at 0:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Subset isn't right. But it seems like there is a Venn diagram between FV and FD. You can start with the strong form with FD, or the weak form and apply FV, and end up with the same approximation. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 6, 2022 at 6:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Philip Roe left a great answer to this subquestion in scicomp.stackexchange.com/a/30277/37438 $\endgroup$
    – IPribec
    Commented Jul 6, 2022 at 8:26