Timeline for Correct way of computing norm $L_2$ for a finite difference scheme
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scicomp.stackexchange.com/ with https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 26, 2015 at 14:47 | vote | accept | Millemila | ||
| May 26, 2015 at 0:57 | answer | added | Doug Lipinski | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 26, 2015 at 0:44 | history | edited | Doug Lipinski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed equation numbering
|
| May 25, 2015 at 22:35 | comment | added | Millemila | Well you need to scale the norm, if you remove 1/N you cannot compute the rate of convergence, For example if one refines the grid by halving the grid spacing in x and y, one has four times the number of grid cells and if the error is 4 times smaller in each point => L2 stays constant. | |
| May 25, 2015 at 22:24 | comment | added | horchler | Why the $1/N$ coefficient? | |
| May 25, 2015 at 21:48 | history | asked | Millemila | CC BY-SA 3.0 |