cult to believe that the first edition manuscript was typewritten, with real cutting and
pasting. The publisher required a paper manuscript with numbered pages—that was
almost our downfall. We could write a book on multivariate statistics, but we couldn’t get the
same number of pages (about 1200, double-spaced) twice in a row. SPSS was in release 9.0,
and the other program we demonstrated was BMDP. There were a mere 11 chapters, of which
6 of them were describing techniques. Multilevel and structural equation modeling were not
yet ready for prime time. Logistic regression and survival analysis were not yet popular.
Material new to this edition includes a redo of all SAS examples, with a pretty new output
format and replacement of interactive analyses that are no longer available. We’ve also re-run
the IBM SPSS examples to show the new output format. We’ve tried to update the references in
all chapters, including only classic citations if they date prior to 2000. New work on relative im-
portance has been incorporated in multiple regression, canonical correlation, and logistic regres-
sion analysis—complete with demonstrations. Multiple imputation procedures for dealing with
missing data have been updated, and we’ve added a new time-series example, taking advantage
of an IBM SPSS expert modeler that replaces previous tea-leaf reading aspects of the analysis.
Our goals in writing the book remain the same as in all previous editions—to present com-
plex statistical procedures in a way that is maximally useful and accessible to researchers who
are not necessarily statisticians. We strive to be short on theory but long on conceptual under-
standing. The statistical packages have become increasingly easy to use, making it all the more
critical to make sure that they are applied with a good understanding of what they can and
cannot do. But above all else—what does it all mean?
We have not changed the basic format underlying all of the technique chapters, now 14 of
them. We start with an overview of the technique, followed by the types of research questions
the techniques are designed to answer. We then provide the cautionary tale—what you need to
worry about and how to deal with those worries. Then come the fundamental equations underly-
ing the technique, which some readers truly enjoy working through (we know because they help-
fully point out any errors and/or inconsistencies they find); but other readers discover they can
skim (or skip) the section without any loss to their ability to conduct meaningful analysis of their
research. The fundamental equations are in the context of a small, made-up, usually silly data set
for which computer analyses are provided—usually IBM SPSS and SAS. Next, we delve into is-
sues surrounding the technique (such as different types of the analysis, follow-up procedures to
the main analysis, and effect size, if it is not amply covered elsewhere). Finally, we provide one or
two full-bore analyses of an actual real-life data set together with a Results section appropriate for
a journal. Data sets for these examples are available at www.pearsonhighered.com in IBM SPSS,
SAS, and ASCII formats. We end each technique chapter with a comparison of features available
in IBM SPSS, SAS, SYSTAT and sometimes other specialized programs. SYSTAT is a statistical
package that we reluctantly had to drop a few editions ago for lack of space.
We apologize in advance for the heft of the book; it is not our intention to line the cof-
fers of chiropractors, physical therapists, acupuncturists, and the like, but there’s really just so
much to say. As to our friendship, it’s still going strong despite living in different cities. Art has
taken the place of creating belly dance costumes for both of us, but we remain silly in outlook,
although serious in our analysis of research.
The lineup of people to thank grows with each edition, far too extensive to list: students,
reviewers, editors, and readers who send us corrections and point out areas of confusion. As
always, we take full responsibility for remaining errors and lack of clarity.
Barbara G. Tabachnick
Linda S. Fidell