Middens, construction fill, and offerings: Evidence for the organization of Classic period craft production at Tikal, Guatemala

H Moholy-Nagy�- Journal of Field Archaeology, 1997 - Taylor & Francis
Journal of Field Archaeology, 1997Taylor & Francis
The production of artifacts of stone, shell, and bone at Tikal, an important center in the
Southern Maya Lowlands, created quantities of durable waste, referred to as debitage. Yet
debitage is not a reliable indicator of production area because of the spatially flexible nature
of Prehispanic technology and site-maintenance activities that shifted manufacturing debris
into secondary contexts. Nevertheless, debitage, even in secondary context, provides
important information on the organization of craft production at Tikal, particularly during the�…
Abstract
The production of artifacts of stone, shell, and bone at Tikal, an important center in the Southern Maya Lowlands, created quantities of durable waste, referred to as debitage. Yet debitage is not a reliable indicator of production area because of the spatially flexible nature of Prehispanic technology and site-maintenance activities that shifted manufacturing debris into secondary contexts. Nevertheless, debitage, even in secondary context, provides important information on the organization of craft production at Tikal, particularly during the Classic Period (ca. A.C. 250–850). Most crafts were organized as household industries, carried on by independent, part-time specialists living in the central area that surrounded the monumental core of the city. The elite probably supported some full-time production to satisfy their demands for status goods and tools for construction projects. Expedient production by nonspecialists, using locally available materials such as chert and bone, occurred at all times.
Production waste was recovered from the construction fill of public and residential architecture and from household middens, mixed with domestic trash. The largest concentrations, however, were found exterior to elite chamber burials and within cached offerings. The delayed identification of debitage from ritual contexts exemplifies the reflexive nature of the way archaeologists classify material culture and their interpretations of the contexts from which it is recovered.
Taylor & Francis Online