An aerobic walking programme versus muscle strengthening programme for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

I Shnayderman, M Katz-Leurer�- Clinical rehabilitation, 2013 - journals.sagepub.com
I Shnayderman, M Katz-Leurer
Clinical rehabilitation, 2013journals.sagepub.com
Objective: To assess the effect of aerobic walking training as compared to active training,
which includes muscle strengthening, on functional abilities among patients with chronic low
back pain. Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial with blind assessors. Setting:
Outpatient clinic. Subjects: Fifty-two sedentary patients, aged 18–65 years with chronic low
back pain. Patients who were post surgery, post trauma, with cardiovascular problems, and
with oncological disease were excluded. Intervention: Experimental 'walking'group�…
Objective
To assess the effect of aerobic walking training as compared to active training, which includes muscle strengthening, on functional abilities among patients with chronic low back pain.
Design
Randomized controlled clinical trial with blind assessors.
Setting
Outpatient clinic.
Subjects
Fifty-two sedentary patients, aged 18–65 years with chronic low back pain. Patients who were post surgery, post trauma, with cardiovascular problems, and with oncological disease were excluded.
Intervention
Experimental ‘walking’ group: moderate intense treadmill walking; control ‘exercise’ group: specific low back exercise; both, twice a week for six weeks.
Main measures
Six-minute walking test, Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire, back and abdomen muscle endurance tests, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Low Back Pain Functional Scale (LBPFS).
Results
Significant improvements were noted in all outcome measures in both groups with non-significant difference between groups. The mean distance in metres covered during 6 minutes increased by 70.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.3–127.7) in the ‘walking’ group and by 43.8 (95% CI 19.6–68.0) in the ‘exercise’ group. The trunk flexor endurance test showed significant improvement in both groups, increasing by 0.6 (95% CI 0.0–1.1) in the ‘walking’ group and by 1.1 (95% CI 0.3–1.8) in the ‘exercise’ group.
Conclusions
A six-week walk training programme was as effective as six weeks of specific strengthening exercises programme for the low back.
Sage Journals