How the five factor model and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predict divergent thinking

BR Walker, CJ Jackson�- Personality and Individual Differences, 2014 - Elsevier
Personality and Individual Differences, 2014Elsevier
Abstract From the Five Factor Model (FFM), we hypothesized openness to experience would
positively predict divergent thinking. From revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST),
we hypothesized revised Behavioural Approach System (r-BAS) would positively predict
divergent thinking and revised Fight/Flight/Freezing System (r-FFFS) would negatively
predict divergent thinking. Moreover, we hypothesized that r-FFFS would incrementally
predict divergent thinking after controlling for significant FFM traits. Consistent with Elliot and�…
Abstract
From the Five Factor Model (FFM), we hypothesized openness to experience would positively predict divergent thinking. From revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST), we hypothesized revised Behavioural Approach System (r-BAS) would positively predict divergent thinking and revised Fight/Flight/Freezing System (r-FFFS) would negatively predict divergent thinking. Moreover, we hypothesized that r-FFFS would incrementally predict divergent thinking after controlling for significant FFM traits. Consistent with Elliot and Thrash (2010), we also hypothesized an indirect effects model with r-BAS predicting divergent thinking through mastery. Using 130 participants, we found support or partial support for all hypotheses. Our results indicate that biological factors of personality associated with r-RST as well as openness to experience predict divergent thinking. The distinction between fear and anxiety in r-RST was also supported with fear and not anxiety negatively predicting divergent thinking.
Elsevier