A systematic review and meta-analysis of applications of the self-report habit index to nutrition and physical activity behaviours
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2011•academic.oup.com
Background Health behaviour models typically neglect habitual action. The Self-Report
Habit Index (SRHI) permits synthesis of evidence of the influence of habit on behaviour.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to review evidence around mean habit strength, habit–
behaviour correlations, and habit� intention interactions, from applications of the SRHI to
dietary, physical activity, and active travel behaviour. Method Electronic database searches
identified 126 potentially relevant papers. Twenty-two papers (21 datasets) passed eligibility�…
Habit Index (SRHI) permits synthesis of evidence of the influence of habit on behaviour.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to review evidence around mean habit strength, habit–
behaviour correlations, and habit� intention interactions, from applications of the SRHI to
dietary, physical activity, and active travel behaviour. Method Electronic database searches
identified 126 potentially relevant papers. Twenty-two papers (21 datasets) passed eligibility�…
Background
Health behaviour models typically neglect habitual action. The Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI) permits synthesis of evidence of the influence of habit on behaviour.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to review evidence around mean habit strength, habit–behaviour correlations, and habit � intention interactions, from applications of the SRHI to dietary, physical activity, and active travel behaviour.
Method
Electronic database searches identified 126 potentially relevant papers. Twenty-two papers (21 datasets) passed eligibility screening. Mean scores and correlations were meta-analysed using fixed, random and mixed effects, and interactions were synthesised via narrative review.
Results
Twenty-three habit–behaviour correlations and nine habit � intention interaction tests were found. Typical habit strength was located around the SRHI midpoint. Weighted habit–behaviour effects were medium-to-strong (fixed: r+ = 0.44; random: r+ = 0.46). Eight tests found that habit moderated the intention–behaviour relation.
Conclusion
More comprehensive understanding of nutrition and activity behaviours will be achieved by accounting for habitual responses to contextual cues.
Oxford University Press