[HTML][HTML] Acute feeding with almonds compared to a carbohydrate-based snack improves appetite-regulating hormones with no effect on self-reported appetite�…

S Carter, AM Hill, JD Buckley, SY Tan…�- European Journal of�…, 2023 - Springer
European Journal of Nutrition, 2023Springer
Purpose Early satiety has been identified as one of the mechanisms that may explain the
beneficial effects of nuts for reducing obesity. This study compared postprandial changes in
appetite-regulating hormones and self-reported appetite ratings after consuming almonds
(AL, 15% of energy requirement) or an isocaloric carbohydrate-rich snack bar (SB). Methods
This is a sub-analysis of baseline assessments of a larger parallel-arm randomised
controlled trial in overweight and obese (Body Mass Index 27.5–34.9 kg/m2) adults (25–65�…
Purpose
Early satiety has been identified as one of the mechanisms that may explain the beneficial effects of nuts for reducing obesity. This study compared postprandial changes in appetite-regulating hormones and self-reported appetite ratings after consuming almonds (AL, 15% of energy requirement) or an isocaloric carbohydrate-rich snack bar (SB).
Methods
This is a sub-analysis of baseline assessments of a larger parallel-arm randomised controlled trial in overweight and obese (Body Mass Index 27.5–34.9�kg/m2) adults (25–65�years). After an overnight fast, 140 participants consumed a randomly allocated snack (AL [n = 68] or SB [n = 72]). Appetite-regulating hormones and self-reported appetite sensations, measured using visual analogue scales, were assessed immediately before snack food consumption, and at 30, 60, 90 and 120�min following snack consumption. A sub-set of participants (AL, n = 49; SB, n = 48) then consumed a meal challenge buffet ad libitum to assess subsequent energy intake. An additional appetite rating assessment was administered post buffet at 150�min.
Results
Postprandial C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) response was 47% smaller with AL compared to SB (p < 0.001). Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide AUC responses were larger with AL compared to SB (18%, p = 0.005; 39% p < 0.001; 45% p < 0.001 respectively). Cholecystokinin, ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1, leptin and polypeptide YY AUCs were not different between groups. Self-reported appetite ratings and energy intake following the buffet did not differ between groups.
Conclusion
More favourable appetite-regulating hormone responses to AL did not translate into better self-reported appetite or reduced short-term energy consumption. Future studies should investigate implications for longer term appetite regulation.
ANZCTR Reference Number
ACTRN12618001861246 2018.
Springer