Detection of serum antim�llerian hormone in women approaching menopause using sensitive antim�llerian hormone enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

DM Robertson, A Kumar, B Kalra, S Shah…�- Menopause, 2014 - journals.lww.com
DM Robertson, A Kumar, B Kalra, S Shah, E Pruysers, HV Brink, D Chizen, JA Visser
Menopause, 2014journals.lww.com
Objective Current antim�llerian hormone (AMH) immunoassays are insufficiently sensitive to
detect circulating AMH levels in ovulatory women approaching menopause. The aim of this
study was to detect serum AMH levels across the menstrual cycle with age, using two new
AMH enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits with increased sensitivity and
differing specificity. Methods Serum AMH levels were determined every 2 to 3 days across
the interovulatory interval of menstrual cycles among women of early-mid reproductive age�…
Objective Current antim�llerian hormone (AMH) immunoassays are insufficiently sensitive to detect circulating AMH levels in ovulatory women approaching menopause. The aim of this study was to detect serum AMH levels across the menstrual cycle with age, using two new AMH enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits with increased sensitivity and differing specificity.
Methods Serum AMH levels were determined every 2 to 3 days across the interovulatory interval of menstrual cycles among women of early-mid reproductive age (18-35 y; n= 10) and late reproductive age (45-55 y; n= 17). Two highly sensitive AMH ELISAs (designated 24/32 and 24/37) with differing sensitivities were developed and applied to sera using a recombinant human pro-mature AMH preparation as reference. A third AMH ELISA (Gen II AMH ELISA kit; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) used was directed on mature-pro regions of AMH.
Results AMH levels in all cycles were detectable with the 24/32 and 24/37 AMH ELISAs. AMH levels across the menstrual cycle were highly correlated (r= 0.98) between the 24/32 and 24/37 AMH ELISAs and the Gen II AMH ELISA (r= 0.94), but with large intracycle variations observed in older women. In late reproductive age, more than 95% of AMH values were detectable with the 24/32 and 24/37 AMH ELISAs, whereas only 36% of AMH values were detectable with the Gen II AMH ELISA. AMH levels were detected in cycles with lower antral follicle count and at a later age using the 24/32 and 24/37 AMH ELISAs compared with the Gen II AMH ELISA. AMH level correlated with antral follicle count in younger women, but not in older women.
Conclusions The new 24/32 and 24/37 AMH ELISAs have the sensitivity to monitor ovarian follicle profiles in late reproductive age.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins