The half-mass radius of MaNGA galaxies: effect of IMF gradients

M Bernardi, RK Sheth…�- Monthly Notices of�…, 2023 - academic.oup.com
M Bernardi, RK Sheth, H Dom�nguez S�nchez, B Margalef-Bentabol, D Bizyaev, RR Lane
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2023academic.oup.com
Gradients in the stellar populations (SP) of galaxies–eg in age, metallicity, stellar initial mass
function (IMF)–can result in gradients in the stellar-mass-to-light ratio, M*/L. Such gradients
imply that the distribution of the stellar mass and light is different. For old SPs, eg in early-
type galaxies at z∼ 0, the M*/L gradients are weak if driven by variations in age and
metallicity, but significantly larger if driven by the IMF. A gradient which has larger M*/L in the
centre increases the estimated total stellar mass (M*) and reduces the scale which contains�…
Abstract
Gradients in the stellar populations (SP) of galaxies – e.g. in age, metallicity, stellar initial mass function (IMF) – can result in gradients in the stellar-mass-to-light ratio, M*/L. Such gradients imply that the distribution of the stellar mass and light is different. For old SPs, e.g. in early-type galaxies at z�∼ 0, the M*/L gradients are weak if driven by variations in age and metallicity, but significantly larger if driven by the IMF. A gradient which has larger M*/L in the centre increases the estimated total stellar mass (M*) and reduces the scale which contains half this mass (Re,*), compared to when the gradient is ignored. For the IMF gradients inferred from fitting MILES simple SP models to the H β, 〈Fe〉, [MgFe], and TiO2SDSS absorption lines measured in spatially resolved spectra of early-type galaxies in the MaNGA survey, the fractional change in Re,* can be significantly larger than that in M*, especially when the light is more centrally concentrated. The Re,*M* correlation which results from accounting for IMF gradients is offset to smaller sizes by 0.3�dex compared to when these gradients are ignored. Comparisons with ‘quiescent’ galaxies at higher z must account for evolution in SP gradients (especially age and IMF) and in the light profile before drawing conclusions about how Re,* and M* evolve. The implied merging between higher z and the present is less contrived if Re,*/Re at z�∼ 0 is closer to our IMF-driven gradient calibration than to unity.
Oxford University Press