1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to figure out whether an options structure is short or long skew without just having someone tell me the answer. I'd like to calculate the number myself. Assuming I am creating a risk reversal at strike 90, 110:

  1. for strike 110: skew = IV of call @ strike 110 - IV of call @ strike 111
  2. for strike 90: skew = IV of put @ strike 90- IV of put @ strike 91
  3. Skew for the risk reversal = -1x skew of call + 1x skew of put

Does this make sense?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A butterfly is not the best structure for saying something about skew. You may want to consider risk reversals instead. $\endgroup$
    – Frido
    Commented Jun 6, 2023 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ ok I will change the question. the structure is not relevant just the process. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6, 2023 at 16:52

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

There are many definitions / concepts of skew. For a good overview of 'skew' you might like Mixon, What does implied volatility skew measure?

What you have done in your example is calculate the slope of the implied volatility smile/skew at two different strikes and then compared the slopes at these two different points. Mathematically speaking there's nothing wrong with this, but that's not the usual way to trade skew or even to quantify skew.

The most straightforward way to trade skew is to trade a risk reversal, i.e. long an OTM put and short an OTM call. You'll be long skew then because if the skew increases, i.e. OTM put IVs increase and OTM call IVs decrease, your structure will gain in value if you bought the risk reversal, all else equal.

The devil is in the 'all else equal'.

The cleanest way to trade skew is actually to trade skewness, which is the third (central) moment of the underlying. But for this you'll need a strip of options appropriately weighted. Skewness is not skew as traders understand it though.

To really trade the difference between two implied volatilities without the other 'noise' you have to trade forward start implied vols of certain strikes; this will give you almost pure exposure to forward start skew, but that may be a step too far at this moment.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Frido, thanks for your excellent answer. From what I understand, you are talking about 2 different concepts? The volatility skew and the skewness in underlying asset returns? Why did you link the two and how is the skewness of underlying returns relevant in trading the volatility skew? $\endgroup$
    – KaiSqDist
    Commented Apr 11 at 9:15

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.