Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy
![University of Wyoming](https://cdn.statically.io/img/pubs.geoscienceworld.org/data/SiteBuilderAssets/Live/Images/uwyo/UWyo_logo1383930369.png)
Dr. George Gaylord Simpson, one of the most important evolutionary biologists of the Twentieth Century, was born on June 16, 1902 and died on October 6, 1984. His contributions to science include not only a modern synthesis of evolutionary thought, but original research on anthropology, mammalogy, paleontology, general biology, and statistics. His prolific writings were intended for scientific and non—scientific communities alike. He helped and encouraged many who now work in the fields of paleontology and evolutionary biology. Contributors to this book dedicate their efforts as tribute to his memory.
Included authors are colleagues, former students, and friends of Dr. Simpson’s. They represent but a few of the people he would have included in these categories. The book is intended to suggest only a sampling of the diversity of George Gaylord Simpson's impact on present vertebrate paleontology, from its most senior to its very junior participants.
Ms. Flanagan’s letter of invitation entreated the following from potential authors: "In the spirit of Dr. Simpson’s own writings, we encourage imaginative contributions that would be just a little different from items expected in a regular scientific journal." The title of the volume (Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy) reflects that request. Though individual articles deal almost exclusively with fossil mammals, emphases cross the spectrum of evolutionary biology, including systematic paleontology, considerations of adaptation, ontogeny, analyses of evolutionary tem— po and mode, biogeographic procedure, and paleogeography. Philip Gingerich’s contribution stresses the crucial importance of solid empirical research to the foundations upon which theoretical/philosophical writings should be based. Mesozoic and Cenozoic taxa are considered, and two articles discuss the modern union of molecular biology, genetics, and paleontology. Most articles benefited directly from the pioneering writings of George Simpson, yet the breadth of concerns of this volume covers only a small fraction of the interests exhibited in his lifetime of evolutionary research.
Kathryn Flanagan served as principal correspondent with authors and reviewers. Jason Lillegraven had principal responsibility for manuscript editing and considerations of production.
We take this opportunity to thank the thirty-two authors for their contributions. Similarly, more than fifty individuals served as unpaid reviewers, and we give our most sincere thanks for their generosity of time and effort. Also, we thank Linda E. Lillegraven for creating the cover design.
The Paleogene record of the rodents: Fact and interpretation
-
Published:January 01, 1986
Abstract
Work of the past fifty years, or so, has shed much additional light on the phylogeny and history of the Order Rodentia. Classical views have been challenged, and new concepts invoked, or older views rediscovered. Of these new concepts, hystricomorphy, rather than protrogomorphy, as a primitive state for rodents seems difficult to accept, and is not really new. Hystricognathy versus sciurognathy as the fundamental division of the Rodentia seems perilous if pardlelism is as important a phenomenon as is frequently suggested. The argument for multiserial incisor enamel, rather than pauciserial, as the primitive incisor kind is very persuasive, but perhaps more work is needed on Eocene rodent enamel. Punctuated equilibrium, if really a new idea, seems promising in explaining the obscure origin of most rodent groups, but gradualism is evident in many specific lines of descent in rodents. Virtually excluding temporal consideration from phylogenetic studies seems extreme, as does cladistic analysis when it excludes parallelisms and paraphyletic groups. In spite of recent work, the gap between Eocene groups such as the Paramyidae and Ctenodactyloidea, and the Oligocene and later families remains considerable, and largely unexplained. Extraterrestrial collision events in this case can hardly be regarded as pertinent for rodents.