Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews
- PMID: 8598702
- DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90538-3
Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews
Abstract
Background: Lately, the number of systematic reviews published has increased substantially. Many systematic reviews exclude trials published in languages other than English. However, there is little empirical evidence to support this action. We looked for differences in the completeness of reporting between trials published in other languages and those published in English, to see whether the exclusion of trials published in other languages is justified.
Methods: We compared completeness of reporting, design characteristics, and analytical approaches of 133 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between 1989 and 1994 and 96 published in French, German, Italian, or Spanish during the same time. RCTs were identified by hand searching of journals (seven in English and six in the other languages).
Findings: We found no significant differences between trials published in English and other-language trials for any single item in the completeness of reporting scale (randomisation, double-blinding, withdrawals), or for the overall score (percentage of maximum possible score 51.0% for trials in English, 46.2% for trials in other languages; 95% CI for difference -1.1 to 10.5). Other-language trials were more likely than English-language trials to have adult participants, to use two or more interventions, and to compare two or more active treatments without an untreated control group. Trials in other languages were less likely to report a clearly prespecified primary outcome or any rationale for sample size estimation.
Interpretation: These results provide evidence for inclusion of all trial reports, irrespective of the language in which they are published, in systematic reviews. Their inclusion is likely to increase precision and may reduce systematic errors. We hope that our findings will prove useful to those developing guidelines and policies for the conduct of reporting of systematic reviews.
Comment in
-
Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English.Lancet. 1996 Mar 30;347(9005):907-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91393-8. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8622430 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Apr;28(2):138-44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000086. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012. PMID: 22559755 Review.
-
The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews.Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(41):1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta7410. Health Technol Assess. 2003. PMID: 14670218 Review.
-
[Is the methodology of our original articles essentially inferior to similar papers published in English-speaking journals?].Rev Med Chil. 1998 Apr;126(4):361-2. Rev Med Chil. 1998. PMID: 9699364 Spanish.
-
Adherence to published standards of reporting: a comparison of placebo-controlled trials published in English or German.JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):247-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.247. JAMA. 1998. PMID: 9676671
-
Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German.Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):326-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02419-7. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 9251637
Cited by
-
Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain and physical function in patients with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.Wien Med Wochenschr. 2023 Nov 24. doi: 10.1007/s10354-023-01025-5. Online ahead of print. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2023. PMID: 37999784 Review. English.
-
The effect of linguistic comprehension instruction on generalized language and reading comprehension skills: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 7;15(4):e1059. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1059. eCollection 2019 Dec. Campbell Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 37131857 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Controlling bias in research.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Oct-Dec;22(4):311-313. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_405_22. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022. PMID: 36511064 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Phototherapy Using Er,Cr:YSGG Laser as a Definitive Treatment for Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review.Int J Gen Med. 2022 May 11;15:4871-4880. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S355890. eCollection 2022. Int J Gen Med. 2022. PMID: 35592535 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials of Clinical Outcomes of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Treating Erectile Dysfunction.Am J Mens Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;16(2):15579883221087532. doi: 10.1177/15579883221087532. Am J Mens Health. 2022. PMID: 35319291 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources