Sex differences in intensity of emotional experience: a social role interpretation
- PMID: 8246109
- DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.65.5.1010
Sex differences in intensity of emotional experience: a social role interpretation
Abstract
According to gender role theory, women's greater emotional intensity than men's stems from normative expectations for sex differences that arise as a result of men's and women's social roles. In the 1st experiment, endorsement of normative expectations for sex differences was associated with sex differences in Ss' own emotions: To the extent that they endorsed stereotypical differences between men and women, female Ss reported personally experiencing emotions of greater intensity and male Ss reported experiencing emotions of lesser intensity. The 2nd study manipulated expectations for responsiveness while Ss viewed a series of emotion-inducing slides. When instructions rendered normative expectations comparable for men and women, no sex differences were obtained in emotion self-reports. Furthermore, women evidenced more extreme electromyograph physiological responding than men, suggesting general sex differences in emotion that are not limited to self-report.
Similar articles
-
Responses to discrimination: the role of emotion and expectations for emotional regulation.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Feb;32(2):149-61. doi: 10.1177/0146167205279906. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006. PMID: 16382078
-
Patterns and causes of gender differences in smoking.Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(9):989-1005. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90157-8. Soc Sci Med. 1991. PMID: 2047903
-
How sex puts you in gendered shoes: sexuality-priming leads to gender-based self-perception and behavior.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul;103(1):176-93. doi: 10.1037/a0028121. Epub 2012 Apr 30. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22545746
-
An underexamined inequality: cultural and psychological barriers to men's engagement with communal roles.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;19(4):343-70. doi: 10.1177/1088868314564789. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015. PMID: 25576312 Review.
-
Redefining sexuality from women's own experiences.Nurs Clin North Am. 1986 Mar;21(1):125-36. Nurs Clin North Am. 1986. PMID: 2937019 Review.
Cited by
-
Unveiling gender differences in psychophysiological dynamics: support for a two-dimensional autonomic space approach.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Mar 13;18:1363891. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1363891. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38545517 Free PMC article.
-
Parental positive affect and negative affect in same- and different-sex parent families: no associations with parental gender and caregiving role.Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 7;15:1332758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332758. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38515971 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of anxiety and its risk factors in burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Wound J. 2024 Feb;21(2):e14705. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14705. Int Wound J. 2024. PMID: 38353163 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding the impact of sisu on workforce and well-being: A machine learning-based analysis.Heliyon. 2024 Jan 7;10(2):e24148. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24148. eCollection 2024 Jan 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38293364 Free PMC article.
-
How Male and Female Literary Authors Write About Affect Across Cultures and Over Historical Periods.Affect Sci. 2023 Sep 5;4(4):770-780. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00219-9. eCollection 2023 Dec. Affect Sci. 2023. PMID: 38156253 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources