Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 4.
doi: 10.1002/mus.28197. Online ahead of print.

F wave analysis based on the compound muscle action potential scan

Xiaoyan Li  1   2 , Maoqi Chen  3 , Paul E Barkhaus  1 , Sanjeev D Nandedkar  1   4 , Brian Schmit  5 , Ping Zhou  3
Affiliations

F wave analysis based on the compound muscle action potential scan

Xiaoyan Li et al. Muscle Nerve. .

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Conventional F wave analysis involves a relatively uniform physiological environment induced by supramaximal stimulations. The F wave characteristics in a dynamic physiological condition, however, are rarely investigated. This study aimed to improve understanding of F wave properties in the more dynamic process by introducing a novel method to analyze F waves based on the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan technique.

Methods: Twenty four healthy subjects participated in the study. The CMAP scan was applied to record muscle responses in the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles, respectively. F wave characteristics including mean F wave amplitude and latency (F-M latency), persistence and activating threshold were quantified.

Results: An average of 200 F waves per muscle were obtained from the CMAP scan recording. Weak to moderate correlations between F wave amplitude and stimulating intensity were observed in most of the APB (19 muscles; r = 0.33 ± 0.14, all p < .05) and ADM (23 muscles, r = 0.46 ± 0.16, all p < .05) muscles. Significantly longer mean F latency and lower activating F-threshold were found in the ADM muscles (F-M latency: APB: 25.43 ± 2.39 ms, ADM: 26.15 ± 2.32 ms, p < .05; F-threshold: APB: 7.68 ± 8.96% CMAP, ADM: 2.35 ± 2.42% CMAP, p < .05).

Discussion: This study introduces new features of F waves using the CMAP scan technique and identifies differences of F wave characteristics between the hand muscles. The CMAP scan based F waves analysis can be combined with the motor unit number estimation to assess functional alterations in motor neurons in neurological disorders.

Keywords: F wave analysis; compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan; electrophysiology; hand muscles; motor neuron.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Fisher MA. F‐waves—physiology and clinical uses. Sci World J. 2007;7:144‐160.
    1. Kimura J. F‐wave determination in nerve conduction studies. Adv Neurol. 1983;39:961‐975.
    1. Fisher MA, Zhu JQ, Uddin MK, Grindstaff P. Submaximal stimulation and f‐wave parameters. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;25(5):299‐303.
    1. Puksa L, Eeg‐Olofsson KE, Stalberg E, Falck B. Reference values for F wave parameters in healthy 3‐20 year old subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(1):199‐204.
    1. Li X, Zong Y, Klein CS, Zhou P. Motor unit number estimation of human abductor hallucis from a compound muscle action potential scan. Muscle Nerve. 2018;58(5):735‐737.

LinkOut - more resources