Pre-implementation context and implementation approach for a nursing and midwifery clinician researcher career pathway: A qualitative study
- PMID: 38956892
- DOI: 10.1111/jan.16307
Pre-implementation context and implementation approach for a nursing and midwifery clinician researcher career pathway: A qualitative study
Abstract
Aim: To describe the pre-implementation context and implementation approach, for a clinician researcher career pathway.
Background: Clinician researchers across all health disciplines are emerging to radically influence practice change and improve patient outcomes. Yet, to date, there are limited clinician researcher career pathways embedded in clinical practice for nurses and midwives.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was used.
Data sources: Data were collected from four online focus groups and four interviews of health consumers, nursing and midwifery clinicians, and nursing unit managers (N = 20) between July 2022 and September 2023.
Results: Thematic and content analysis identified themes/categories relating to: Research in health professionals' roles and nursing and midwifery, and Research activity and culture (context); with implementation approaches within coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring (Normalization Process Theory).
Conclusions: The Pathway was perceived to meet organizational objectives with the potential to create significant cultural change in nursing and midwifery. Backfilling of protected research time was essential.
Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The Pathway was seen as an instrument to empower staff, foster staff retention and extend research opportunities to every nurse and midwife, while improving patient experiences and outcomes.
Impact: Clinicians, consumers and managers fully supported the implementation of clinician researchers with this Pathway. The Pathway could engage all clinicians in evidence-based practice with a clinician researcher leader, effect practice change with colleagues and enhance patient outcomes.
Reporting method: This study adheres to relevant EQUATOR guidelines using the COREG checklist.
Patient or public contribution: Health consumers involved in this research as participants, did not contribute to the design or conduct of the study, analysis or interpretation of the data, or in the preparation of the manuscript.
Keywords: clinical academic; clinician researcher; clinician scientist; consumer; implementation; midwife; midwifery; nurse; nursing; professional pathway.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Clinician researcher career pathway for registered nurses and midwives: A proposal.Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):e12640. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12640. Epub 2018 Mar 25. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018. PMID: 29575330
-
Failed implementation of a nursing intervention to support family caregivers: An evaluation study using Normalization Process Theory.J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jun 17. doi: 10.1111/jan.16261. Online ahead of print. J Adv Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38884574
-
Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs, Implementation, and Organizational Culture and Readiness for EBP Among Nurses, Midwives, Educators, and Students in the Republic of Ireland.Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Dec;18(6):379-388. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12543. Epub 2021 Nov 8. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021. PMID: 34750977
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314 Review.
-
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011. PMID: 22093388 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences. (2022). Research and Innovation as Core Functions in Transforming the Health System: A Vision for the Future of Health in Australia. Accessed 6 December, 2023 www.aahms.org
-
- Avery, M., Westwood, G., & Richardson, A. (2021). Enablers and barriers to progressing a clinical academic career in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions: A cross‐sectional survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31, 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15673
-
- Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
-
- Carrick‐Sen, D., Moore, A., Davidson, P., Gendong, H., & Jackson, D. (2019). International perspectives of nurses, midwives and allied health professionals clinical academic roles: Are we at tipping point? International Journal of Practice‐Based Learning in Health and Social Care, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v7i2.639
-
- Carrick‐Sen, D., Richardson, A., Moore, A., & Dolan, S. (2016). Transforming healthcare through clinical academic roles in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions: A practical resource for healthcare provider Organisations. AUKUH.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources