Reevaluation of ovarian cyst fine-needle aspiration cytology: A 10-year institutional experience
- PMID: 38916141
- DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae077
Reevaluation of ovarian cyst fine-needle aspiration cytology: A 10-year institutional experience
Abstract
Objectives: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of ovarian cyst fluid remains useful for certain clinical circumstances despite low sensitivity and potential safety concerns. The current study aimed to reevaluate the performance of ovarian cystic fluid cytology following American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines using a single-institution cohort.
Methods: A total of 507 ovarian cyst FNA cases from 2013 to 2023 were reviewed. Patients' demographics and clinical and radiologic information were collected through the electronic database. The performance was calculated using corresponding surgical pathology diagnosis as the gold standard.
Results: Overall, cytologic diagnoses were nondiagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypical (ATY), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (M) in 5 (1.0%), 478 (94.3%), 14 (2.7%), 2 (0.4%), and 8 (1.6%) cases, respectively. Among 349 specimens (68.8%) that had a corresponding surgical pathology, the rate of malignancy (including borderline tumors) was 1.2% (4 of 325) in NFM, 72.7% in ATY (8 of 11), and 100% in both SFM (2 of 2) and M (8 of 8) specimens. Considering NFM and ATY as negative results and SFM and M as positive results, overall, the sensitivity of ovarian cystic fluid cytology was 45.4% and the specificity was 100%.
Conclusions: As an uncommon test, ovarian cystic fluid cytology has moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Despite limitations, ovarian cystic FNA cytology remains a valuable diagnostic tool in certain aspects.
Keywords: cytologic-histologic correlation; fine-needle aspiration; fluid cytology; ovarian cyst.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Performance of ovarian cyst fluid fine-needle aspiration cytology.Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Feb;126(2):112-121. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21911. Epub 2017 Aug 21. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018. PMID: 28834408
-
Aspiration cytology of neoplastic and non-neoplastic ovarian cysts: is it accurate?Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1996 Apr;15(2):94-101. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199604000-00002. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1996. PMID: 8786211
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic and staging tool for rectal and perirectal lesions-an institutional experience.Ann Diagn Pathol. 2013 Dec;17(6):494-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 9. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2013. PMID: 24028888
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in 179 cases: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.Cancer. 2002 Jun 25;96(3):174-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10614. Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12115306
-
Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the ovary.Clin Lab Med. 1995 Sep;15(3):705-26. Clin Lab Med. 1995. PMID: 8542730 Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials