Association between Stimulation-Site Pain and Clinical Improvement during Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Patients with Major Depressive Disorders: A Prospective Observational Study at Two Sites
- PMID: 38889691
- DOI: 10.1159/000538971
Association between Stimulation-Site Pain and Clinical Improvement during Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Patients with Major Depressive Disorders: A Prospective Observational Study at Two Sites
Abstract
Introduction: The clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in Japan has not been adequately investigated. Furthermore, the relationship between stimulation-site pain and the antidepressant effects of rTMS has not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify (1) the real-world efficacy and safety of rTMS for TRD in Japan and (2) the relationship between stimulation-site pain and clinical improvement of depressive symptoms.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study involving 50 right-handed patients with TRD. All patients received high-frequency rTMS for up to 6 weeks. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS). Pain at the stimulation site was reported by the patients using a visual analog scale (VAS) after each session. Remission and response rates at 3 and 6 weeks were calculated based on the MADRS scores. The correlation between changes in the MADRS and VAS scores was examined.
Results: Remission and response rates were 36% and 46%, respectively, at the end of 3 weeks, and 60% and 70%, respectively, at 6 weeks. At the end of the treatment, there was significant correlation between the reduction of MADRS and VAS scores (r = 0.42, p = 0.003).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the clinical efficacy of rTMS in Japan and the correlation between its antidepressant effects and stimulation-site pain.
Keywords: Major depressive disorder; Motor threshold; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Stimulation-site pain; Visual analog scale.
© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in management of treatment-resistant depression: A retrospective analysis.Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul-Sep;60(3):329-333. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_182_16. Indian J Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 30405260 Free PMC article.
-
Neurostimulation Methods in the Treatment of Depression: A Comparison of rTMS, tDCS, and Venlafaxine Using a Pooled Analysis of Two Studies.Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 May 28;17:1713-1722. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S303226. eCollection 2021. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021. PMID: 34093015 Free PMC article.
-
Low frequency (1-Hz), right prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with venlafaxine ER in the treatment of resistant depression: a double-blind, single-centre, randomized study.J Affect Disord. 2009 Nov;118(1-3):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.032. Epub 2009 Feb 26. J Affect Disord. 2009. PMID: 19249105 Clinical Trial.
-
The association of total pulses with the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression: A dose-response meta-analysis.Asian J Psychiatr. 2024 Feb;92:103891. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103891. Epub 2023 Dec 25. Asian J Psychiatr. 2024. PMID: 38183740 Review.
-
[Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in major depression: a review].Encephale. 2007 Mar-Apr;33(2):126-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)91542-0. Encephale. 2007. PMID: 17675907 Review. French.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources