Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun:351 Suppl 1:116456.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116456. Epub 2024 May 31.

Gender(ed) science: How the institutionalization of gender continues to shape the conduct and content of women's health research

Morgan M Philbin  1 , Bethany G Everett  2 , Judith D Auerbach  3
Affiliations

Gender(ed) science: How the institutionalization of gender continues to shape the conduct and content of women's health research

Morgan M Philbin et al. Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviors, and attributes that a particular society considers appropriate for men and women based on assumptions about biological sex. It also operates as a major social organizing principle that confers unequal power, status, and resources to men and women, with direct consequences for health. Historic patriarchal and misogynistic beliefs and values are reinforced through social institutions, including health science, which reify gender inequities. This commentary examines two key domains in which the social organization and institutionalization of gender in scientific research affect the conduct of women's health research and, by extension, women's health outcomes. These domains are: 1) decisions about which topics are prioritized, researched, and funded and 2) the dissemination of research findings. Using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a case study to illustrate broader patterns in scientific research, we present evidence of gender-based inequities in what is prioritized, deemed fundable, and disseminated, and how this affects knowledge production and attention to women's health. We highlight efforts and progress made by the NIH and call for additional attention to further address gender-based inequities and their impact on women's health research. We conclude with a call for critical social science analyses-ideally supported by the NIH-of the social organization of health science research to identify points of intervention for redressing deep-seated obstacles to advancing research on women's health.

Keywords: Commentary; Gendered hierarchies; Misogyny; Research funding; Social organization of gender; Women's health; Women's health research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

LinkOut - more resources