Frequency and phase correction of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy using complex-valued convolutional neural networks
- PMID: 38744351
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.05.008
Frequency and phase correction of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy using complex-valued convolutional neural networks
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the significance of complex-valued inputs and complex-valued convolutions compared to real-valued inputs and real-valued convolutions in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for frequency and phase correction (FPC) of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data.
Methods: An ablation study using simulated data was performed to determine the most effective input (real or complex) and convolution type (real or complex) to predict frequency and phase shifts in GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data using CNNs. The best CNN model was subsequently compared using both simulated and in vivo data to two recently proposed deep learning (DL) methods for FPC of GABA-edited MRS. All methods were trained using the same experimental setup and evaluated using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and linewidth of the GABA peak, choline artifact, and by visually assessing the reconstructed final difference spectrum. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Results: The ablation study showed that using complex values for the input represented by real and imaginary channels in our model input tensor, with complex convolutions was most effective for FPC. Overall, in the comparative study using simulated data, our CC-CNN model (that received complex-valued inputs with complex convolutions) outperformed the other models as evaluated by the mean absolute error.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that the optimal CNN configuration for GABA-edited MRS FPC uses a complex-valued input and complex convolutions. Overall, this model outperformed existing DL models.
Keywords: 1H spectroscopy; Convolutional neural networks (CNN); Frequency and phase correction; GABA-edited MRS; Machine learning; Pre-processing.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest All co-authors have nothing to declare.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Spectral Registration Using Deep Learning.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Mar;59(3):964-975. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28868. Epub 2023 Jul 4. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024. PMID: 37401726
-
A comprehensive guide to MEGA-PRESS for GABA measurement.Anal Biochem. 2023 May 15;669:115113. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2023.115113. Epub 2023 Mar 21. Anal Biochem. 2023. PMID: 36958511 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Frequency and phase correction of J-difference edited MR spectra using deep learning.Magn Reson Med. 2021 Apr;85(4):1755-1765. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28525. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Magn Reson Med. 2021. PMID: 33210342 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency and phase correction for multiplexed edited MRS of GABA and glutathione.Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jul;80(1):21-28. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27027. Epub 2017 Dec 7. Magn Reson Med. 2018. PMID: 29215137 Free PMC article.
-
Current practice in the use of MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA.Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.004. Epub 2012 Dec 13. Neuroimage. 2014. PMID: 23246994 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources