Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 3:10:e52691.
doi: 10.2196/52691.

Exploring the Association Between Structural Racism and Mental Health: Geospatial and Machine Learning Analysis

Affiliations

Exploring the Association Between Structural Racism and Mental Health: Geospatial and Machine Learning Analysis

Fahimeh Mohebbi et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: Structural racism produces mental health disparities. While studies have examined the impact of individual factors such as poverty and education, the collective contribution of these elements, as manifestations of structural racism, has been less explored. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, with its racial and socioeconomic diversity, provides a unique context for this multifactorial investigation.

Objective: This research aimed to delineate the association between structural racism and mental health disparities in Milwaukee County, using a combination of geospatial and deep learning techniques. We used secondary data sets where all data were aggregated and anonymized before being released by federal agencies.

Methods: We compiled 217 georeferenced explanatory variables across domains, initially deliberately excluding race-based factors to focus on nonracial determinants. This approach was designed to reveal the underlying patterns of risk factors contributing to poor mental health, subsequently reintegrating race to assess the effects of racism quantitatively. The variable selection combined tree-based methods (random forest) and conventional techniques, supported by variance inflation factor and Pearson correlation analysis for multicollinearity mitigation. The geographically weighted random forest model was used to investigate spatial heterogeneity and dependence. Self-organizing maps, combined with K-means clustering, were used to analyze data from Milwaukee communities, focusing on quantifying the impact of structural racism on the prevalence of poor mental health.

Results: While 12 influential factors collectively accounted for 95.11% of the variability in mental health across communities, the top 6 factors-smoking, poverty, insufficient sleep, lack of health insurance, employment, and age-were particularly impactful. Predominantly, African American neighborhoods were disproportionately affected, which is 2.23 times more likely to encounter high-risk clusters for poor mental health.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that structural racism shapes mental health disparities, with Black community members disproportionately impacted. The multifaceted methodological approach underscores the value of integrating geospatial analysis and deep learning to understand complex social determinants of mental health. These insights highlight the need for targeted interventions, addressing both individual and systemic factors to mitigate mental health disparities rooted in structural racism.

Keywords: deep learning; geospatial; health disparities; machine learning; mental health; racial disparities; social determinant of health; structural racism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Partial dependence plots illustrate the marginal effect of each of the 12 selected predictor variables on the prevalence of poor mental health. The Y-axis in each plot indicates the prevalence of poor mental health outcomes, quantified as a percentage, and the X-axes represent the value of each predictive variable. The curve in each partial dependence plot shows the relationship between the predictor variable and the prevalence of poor mental health outcomes. An ascending curve implies that an increase in the predictor variable corresponds with an increase in poor mental health outcomes, while a descending curve implies the opposite.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographic variation in place-based risk factors impacting mental health. Maps represent a visualization of the localized influences of 6 place-based risk factors—prevalence of smoking, lack of health insurance, poverty level, insufficient sleep, employment status, and median age—on predictions of poor mental health. Visualization is based on the findings of the GWRF model. Each risk factor is represented in a separate map, with color gradients signifying areas of varying impact on mental health. Darker shades indicate regions where a risk factor significantly correlates with poor mental health, while lighter shades correspond to weaker correlations. These visual representations underscore the spatial heterogeneity of mental health determinants and the significance of targeted interventions. GWRF: geographically weighted random forest. For a higher-resolution version of this figure, see Multimedia Appendix 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Integrated self-organizing map and k-means showing the 3 clusters of census tracts in Milwaukee County based on similarities among the 12 mental health risk factors. The differences between clusters are maximized and within clusters are minimized. The size or area of each wedge reflects its proportional “influence” on mental health in the corresponding census track grouping.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Spatial distribution of mental health risk clusters in Milwaukee County. This map presents the locations of communities that comprise the 3 risk clusters—low, moderate, and high (clusters 1-3)—identified based on 12 key place-based mental health factors. SOM: self-organizing map.

Similar articles

References

    1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2023. [2023-08-08]. https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/
    1. Flint AJ, Novotny TE. Poverty status and cigarette smoking prevalence and cessation in the United States, 1983-1993: the independent risk of being poor. Tob Control. 1997;6(1):14–18. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.1.14. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/9176981 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galea S, Nandi A, Vlahov D. The epidemiology of post-traumatic stress disorder after disasters. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27(1):78–91. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxi003. https://academic.oup.com/epirev/article/27/1/78/520813?login=false 27/1/78 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pascoe EA, Lattanner MR, Richman LS. Meta-analysis of interpersonal discrimination and health-related behaviors. Health Psychol. 2022;41(5):319–331. doi: 10.1037/hea0001147.2022-56233-001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bueno-Notivol J, Gracia-García P, Olaya B, Lasheras I, López-Antón R, Santabárbara J. Prevalence of depression during the COVID-19 outbreak: a meta-analysis of community-based studies. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021;21(1):100196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.07.007. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1697-2600(20)30054-5 S1697-2600(20)30054-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources