Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 18;14(1):8967.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59316-9.

Ultrasonographic examination of masticatory muscles in patients with TMJ arthralgia and headache attributed to temporomandibular disorders

Affiliations

Ultrasonographic examination of masticatory muscles in patients with TMJ arthralgia and headache attributed to temporomandibular disorders

Yeon-Hee Lee et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study used ultrasonography to compare the thickness and cross-sectional area of the masticatory muscles in patients with temporomandibular joint arthralgia and investigated the differences according to sex and the co-occurrence of headache attributed to temporomandibular disorders (HATMD). The observational study comprised 100 consecutive patients with TMJ arthralgia (71 females and 29 males; mean age, 40.01 ± 17.67 years) divided into two groups: Group 1, including 86 patients with arthralgia alone (60 females; 41.15 ± 17.65 years); and Group 2, including 14 patients with concurrent arthralgia and HATMD (11 females; 33.00 ± 16.72 years). The diagnosis of TMJ arthralgia was based on the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. The parameters of the masticatory muscles examined by ultrasonography were subjected to statistical analysis. The pain area (2.23 ± 1.75 vs. 5.79 ± 2.39, p-value = 0.002) and visual analog scale (VAS) score (3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 5.57 ± 12.14, p-value = 0.002) were significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1. Muscle thickness (12.58 ± 4.24 mm) and cross-sectional area (4.46 ± 2.57 cm2) were larger in the masseter muscle than in the other three masticatory muscles (p-value < 0.001). When examining sex-based differences, the thickness and area of the masseter and lower temporalis muscles were significantly larger in males (all p-value < 0.05). The area of the masseter muscle (4.67 ± 2.69 vs. 3.18 ± 0.92, p-value = 0.004) and lower temporalis muscle (3.76 ± 0.95 vs. 3.21 ± 1.02, p-value = 0.049) was significantly smaller in Group 2 than in Group 1. An increase in VAS was significantly negatively correlated with the thickness of the masseter (r = - 0.268) and lower temporalis (r = - 0.215), and the cross-sectional area of the masseter (r = - 0.329) and lower temporalis (r = - 0.293). The masseter and lower temporalis muscles were significantly thinner in females than in males, and their volumes were smaller in patients with TMJ arthralgia and HATMD than in those with TMJ arthralgia alone. HATMD and decreased masseter and lower temporalis muscle volume were associated with increased pain intensity.

Keywords: Arthralgia; Headache attributed to temporomandibular disorders; Masseter muscle; Temporalis muscle; Temporomandibular disorder; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pain area using overlapping grids on the right and left side of the face. The pain area was calculated by summing the number of grids marked with the area where the patient self-marked their pain.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram and actual ultrasound image of each masticatory muscle. (a) Masseter, (b) lower temporalis, (c) upper temporalis, and (d) medial pterygoid muscles.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sex-based differences in muscle thickness and cross-sectional area. (a) Thickness and (b) cross-sectional area.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Differences in muscle thickness and cross-sectional area among the TMD groups. (a) Thickness and (b) cross-sectional area.

Similar articles

References

    1. Schiffman E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28:6–27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dworkin SF. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Current status & future relevance. J. Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:734–743. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02090.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia38, 1–211. 10.1177/0333102417738202 (2018). - PubMed
    1. Valesan LF, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021;25:441–453. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bagis B, Ayaz EA, Turgut S, Durkan R, Özcan M. Gender difference in prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders: A retrospective study on 243 consecutive patients. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2012;9:539–544. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4474. - DOI - PMC - PubMed