No Bones About It: Sex Is Binary
- PMID: 38565789
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02851-3
No Bones About It: Sex Is Binary
Abstract
Anthropologists have led the way in formulating techniques that reveal skeletal differences between males and females. Understanding of physical differences in the pelvis related to childbirth, hormonal impacts on bones, and extensive comparative studies have provided anthropologists with an array of traits and measurements that help them estimate sex using just bones. Forensic anthropologists and bioarcheologists are improving their ability to differentiate males and females by increasing research on a variety of postcranial bones and through the use of molecular data, especially new methods called proteomics, to identify sex in prepubescent juveniles. As remains from more cultures and time periods are studied, sex identification will continue to improve, because skeletal sex differences are in large part biologically determined. Yet, anthropologists have also been at the forefront of arguing that sex lies on a spectrum. Anthropologists who view sex as on a spectrum may deter sex identification progress; from their perspective, an individual of an undetermined sex may just be a nonbinary individual. Anthropologists who consider sex is on a spectrum are coming to this conclusion in part because they are looking for anatomical ideals, mistaking pathology for variation, and confusing independent variables with dependent variables. Nonetheless, anthropologists need to continue to improve sex identification techniques to reconstruct the past accurately, which may reveal less strict sex roles than previously presumed and help with the identification of crime victims. Forensic anthropologists should also increase their efforts to identify whether individuals have undergone medical procedures intended to change one's gender due to the current rise in transitioning individuals.
Keywords: Archeology; Binary sex; Forensic anthropology; Gender; Sex estimation; Skeletal remains; Transgender.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Postcranial sex estimation of individuals considered Hispanic.J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jan;58 Suppl 1:S9-14. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12006. Epub 2012 Nov 5. J Forensic Sci. 2013. PMID: 23127214
-
A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework.Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Apr;261:165.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Feb 15. Forensic Sci Int. 2016. PMID: 26926105 Review.
-
Accuracy Rates of Sex Estimation by Forensic Anthropologists through Comparison with DNA Typing Results in Forensic Casework.J Forensic Sci. 2016 Sep;61(5):1307-10. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13137. Epub 2016 Jun 29. J Forensic Sci. 2016. PMID: 27352918
-
Improving Nonmetric Sex Classification for Hispanic Individuals.J Forensic Sci. 2017 Jul;62(4):975-980. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13391. Epub 2017 Jan 10. J Forensic Sci. 2017. PMID: 28070893
-
[Skull-facial anthropometric traits of forensic odontological interest for estimating sex, race and age. Review of the literature].Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021 Mar 11;9(1):e047. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-0901-2021-047. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar. Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021. PMID: 38464411 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
References
-
- Abdualhadi, E. M., Hegazy, N. I., & Abdelaal, G. M. (2022). Brief overview of sex identification from the sternum. NeuroQuantology, 20(10), 12060–12067. https://doi.org/10.48047/NQ.2022.20.10.NQ551167 - DOI
-
- Al Amin, A. S. M. & Carter, K. R. (2023). Polydactyly. StatPearls [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562295/
-
- American Anthropological Association. (2023). No place for transphobia in anthropology: Session pulled from annual meeting program. https://americananthro.org/news/no-place-for-transphobia-in-anthropology...
-
- American Association of Biological Anthropologists. (2023). AABA statement in support of trans lives. https://bioanth.org/about/position-statements/aaba-statement-in-support-...
-
- Astorino, C. M. (2019). Beyond dimorphism: Sexual polymorphism and research bias in biological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 121(2), 489–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13224 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous