Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) Evidence Review of Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Narrative Review
- PMID: 38520658
- PMCID: PMC11111626
- DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00588-4
Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) Evidence Review of Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Introduction: Interventional treatment options for the lumbar degenerative spine have undergone a significant amount of innovation over the last decade. As new technologies emerge, along with the surgical specialty expansion, there is no manuscript that utilizes a review of surgical treatments with evidence rankings from multiple specialties, namely, the interventional pain and spine communities. Through the Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS), the purpose of this manuscript is to provide a balanced evidence review of available surgical treatments.
Methods: The PSPS Research Committee created a working group that performed a comprehensive literature search on available surgical technologies for the treatment of the degenerative spine, utilizing the ranking assessment based on USPSTF (United States Preventative Services Taskforce) and NASS (North American Spine Society) criteria.
Results: The surgical treatments were separated based on disease process, including treatments for degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis.
Conclusions: There is emerging and significant evidence to support multiple approaches to treat the symptomatic lumbar degenerative spine. As new technologies become available, training, education, credentialing, and peer review are essential for optimizing patient safety and successful outcomes.
Keywords: Degenerative spine disease; Lumbar fusion; Minimally invasive spine; Spinal stenosis; Spondylolisthesis.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Michael J Dorsi serves as a consultant for Abbott, Camber Spine, Life Spine, Nevro, Nuvasive. Patrick Buchanan serves as a consultant and principal investigator for Abbott and PainTEQ. Chau Vu serves as a consultant for Saluda Medical; consultant and principal investigator for PainTEQ. Harjot S Bhandal serves as a consultant for Saluda Medica and principal investigator for Aurora Spine. David W Lee serves as a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Mainstay Medical, Petal Surgical; speakers bureau for Abbott. Samir Sheth serves as consultant for SPR, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Vertos. Phil M Shumsky serves as a consultant for Saluda Medical. Nolan J Brown has no disclosures or conflicts of interest. Alexander Himstead has no disclosures or conflicts of interest. Ryan Mattie serves as a consultant for SPR therapeutics and Sutton Pierce. Steven M Falowski serves as a consultant for Saluda Medical, SPR Therapeutics, CornerLoc, PaintTEQ, SpineThera, and Aurora Spine and has relevant financial relationships with Abbott, Medtronic, Saluda Medical, CornerLoc and Mainstay. Ramana Naidu serves as a consultant for Avanos, Abbott, Bicycle Health, Biotronik, Bioventus, Boston Scientific, Cerevu, DoctorPlan, ExerAI, KarunaLabs, Medtronic, Nalu, Omnia Medical, PainTEQ, Relievant, Sonosite, SPR Therapeutics, and Vivex. Jason E Pope serves as a consultant for Abbott, Medtronic, Saluda, Flowonix, SpineThera, Vertos, Vertiflex, SPR Therapeutics, Tersera, Aurora, Spark, Ethos, Biotronik, Mainstay, WISE, Boston Scientific, Thermaquil; has received grant and research support from: Abbott, Flowonix, Saluda, Aurora, PainTEQ, Ethos, Muse, Boston Scientific, SPR Therapeutics, Mainstay, Vertos, AIS, Thermaquil; and is a shareholder of: Vertos, SPR Therapeutics, PainTEQ, Aurora, Spark, Celeri Health, Neural Integrative Solutions, Pacific Research Institute, Thermaquil and Anesthetic Gas Reclamation.
Similar articles
-
Guideline summary review: An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Spine J. 2016 Mar;16(3):439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.055. Epub 2015 Dec 8. Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26681351 Review.
-
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update).Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):734-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059. Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23830297 Review.
-
Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(10):1-98. Epub 2006 Apr 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006. PMID: 23074480 Free PMC article.
-
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 May 17. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19447684 Review.
-
[Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].Neurocirugia (Astur). 2007 Oct;18(5):406-13. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2007. PMID: 18008014 Review. Spanish.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials