Practical Considerations When Choosing Chemoembolization versus Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- PMID: 38495267
- PMCID: PMC10940042
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779714
Practical Considerations When Choosing Chemoembolization versus Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are common liver-directed therapies (LDTs) for unresectable HCC. While both deliver intra-arterial treatment directly to the site of the tumor, they differ in mechanisms of action and side effects. Several studies have compared their side effect profile, time to progression, and overall survival data, but often these lack practical considerations when choosing which treatment modality to use. Many factors can impact operator's choice for treatment, and the choice depends on treatment availability, cost, insurance coverage, operator's comfort level, patient-specific factors, tumor location, tumor biology, and disease stage. This review discusses survival data, time to progression data, as well as more practical patient and tumor characteristics for personalized LDT with TACE or TARE.
Keywords: chemoembolization; hepatocellular carcinoma; interventional radiology; liver-directed therapy; radioembolization.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to the material presented herein.
Similar articles
-
Transarterial chemoembolization versus transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: optimization of selecting treatment modality.Hepatol Int. 2016 Nov;10(6):883-892. doi: 10.1007/s12072-016-9722-9. Epub 2016 Apr 28. Hepatol Int. 2016. PMID: 27126821 Review.
-
Transarterial therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for transarterial embolization: a US cost-effectiveness analysis.J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1061-1071. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2248840. J Med Econ. 2023. PMID: 37632520
-
Safety and Efficacy of Transarterial Radioembolization Combined with Chemoembolization for Bilobar Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):459-465. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1826-7. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29067511
-
Comparison of health-related quality of life after transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Apr;44(4):1554-1561. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1802-y. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019. PMID: 30311050
-
Transarterial Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Adv Ther. 2016 May;33(5):699-714. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0324-7. Epub 2016 Apr 2. Adv Ther. 2016. PMID: 27039186 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R L et al.Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(03):209–249. - PubMed
-
- Lewandowski R J, Kulik L M, Riaz A et al.A comparative analysis of transarterial downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization versus radioembolization. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(08):1920–1928. - PubMed
-
- Kwon J H, Kim G M, Han K et al.Safety and efficacy of transarterial radioembolization combined with chemoembolization for bilobar hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(03):459–465. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous