Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment
- PMID: 38424214
- DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02827-9
Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in healthcare research to provide evidence of the benefits and risks of interventions from the patient perspective and to inform regulatory decisions and health policy. The use of PROs in clinical practice can facilitate symptom monitoring, tailor care to individual needs, aid clinical decision-making and inform value-based healthcare initiatives. Despite their benefits, there are concerns that the potential burden on respondents may reduce their willingness to complete PROs, with potential impact on the completeness and quality of the data for decision-making. We therefore conducted an initial literature review to generate a list of candidate recommendations aimed at reducing respondent burden. This was followed by a two-stage Delphi survey by an international multi-stakeholder group. A consensus meeting was held to finalize the recommendations. The final consensus statement includes 19 recommendations to address PRO respondent burden in healthcare research and clinical practice. If implemented, these recommendations may reduce PRO respondent burden.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection.Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 12;13(1):6026. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33826-4. Nat Commun. 2022. PMID: 36224187 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension.JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):483-494. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21903. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29411037
-
Ethical Considerations for the Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Research: The PRO Ethics Guidelines.JAMA. 2022 May 17;327(19):1910-1919. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.6421. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35579638
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Patient-Reported Outcomes in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway.Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1874-1882. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002758. Anesth Analg. 2018. PMID: 29293180 Review.
Cited by
-
Toward a more patient-centered drug development process in clinical trials for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): Practical considerations from the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS).Hemasphere. 2024 May 21;8(5):e69. doi: 10.1002/hem3.69. eCollection 2024 May. Hemasphere. 2024. PMID: 38774655 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Aiyegbusi, O. L., Nair, D., Peipert, J. D., Schick-Makaroff, K. & Mucsi, I. A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 12, 20406223211015958 (2021). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
-
- Cruz Rivera, S. et al. The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 17, 156 (2019). - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous