Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar;30(3):650-659.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02827-9. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment

Affiliations
Review

Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment

Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi et al. Nat Med. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in healthcare research to provide evidence of the benefits and risks of interventions from the patient perspective and to inform regulatory decisions and health policy. The use of PROs in clinical practice can facilitate symptom monitoring, tailor care to individual needs, aid clinical decision-making and inform value-based healthcare initiatives. Despite their benefits, there are concerns that the potential burden on respondents may reduce their willingness to complete PROs, with potential impact on the completeness and quality of the data for decision-making. We therefore conducted an initial literature review to generate a list of candidate recommendations aimed at reducing respondent burden. This was followed by a two-stage Delphi survey by an international multi-stakeholder group. A consensus meeting was held to finalize the recommendations. The final consensus statement includes 19 recommendations to address PRO respondent burden in healthcare research and clinical practice. If implemented, these recommendations may reduce PRO respondent burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiyegbusi, O. L. et al. Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection. Nat. Commun. 13, 6026 (2022). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Aiyegbusi, O. L., Nair, D., Peipert, J. D., Schick-Makaroff, K. & Mucsi, I. A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 12, 20406223211015958 (2021). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Cruz Rivera, S. et al. The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 17, 156 (2019). - DOI
    1. Cruz Rivera, S. et al. Patient-reported outcomes in the regulatory approval of medical devices. Nat. Med. 27, 2067–2068 (2021). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Calvert, M., Kyte, D., Price, G., Valderas, J. M. & Hjollund, N. H. Maximising the impact of patient-reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ 364, k5267 (2019). - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources