Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 28;30(4):381-417.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i4.381.

Current status of magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma: A quantitative review with Radiomics Quality Score

Affiliations
Review

Current status of magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma: A quantitative review with Radiomics Quality Score

Valentina Brancato et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Radiomics is a promising tool that may increase the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for different tasks related to the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its implementation in clinical practice is still far, with many issues related to the methodological quality of radiomic studies.

Aim: To systematically review the current status of MRI radiomic studies concerning HCC using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS).

Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases was performed to identify original articles focusing on the use of MRI radiomics for HCC management published between 2017 and 2023. The methodological quality of radiomic studies was assessed using the RQS tool. Spearman's correlation (ρ) analysis was performed to explore if RQS was correlated with journal metrics and characteristics of the studies. The level of statistical signi-ficance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: One hundred and twenty-seven articles were included, of which 43 focused on HCC prognosis, 39 on prediction of pathological findings, 16 on prediction of the expression of molecular markers outcomes, 18 had a diagnostic purpose, and 11 had multiple purposes. The mean RQS was 8 ± 6.22, and the corresponding percentage was 24.15% ± 15.25% (ranging from 0.0% to 58.33%). RQS was positively correlated with journal impact factor (IF; ρ = 0.36, P = 2.98 × 10-5), 5-years IF (ρ = 0.33, P = 1.56 × 10-4), number of patients included in the study (ρ = 0.51, P < 9.37 × 10-10) and number of radiomics features extracted in the study (ρ = 0.59, P < 4.59 × 10-13), and time of publication (ρ = -0.23, P < 0.0072).

Conclusion: Although MRI radiomics in HCC represents a promising tool to develop adequate personalized treatment as a noninvasive approach in HCC patients, our study revealed that studies in this field still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiomics; Radiomics quality score; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of included studies. HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of Radiomics Quality Score assessment. A: Histogram plot of row counts of included studies according to Results of Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) percentage; B: Pie chart of the mean RQS of included studies. RQS: Radiomics Quality Score.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatterplots with regression lines showing correlations between Radiomics Quality Score and journal metrics. A: Correlation between Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and number of included patients; B: Correlation between RQS and number of radiomic features extracted; C: Correlation between RQS and impact factor (IF); D: Correlation between RQS and 5-years IF; E: Correlation between RQS and first author. Each point corresponds to a study. RQS: Radiomics Quality Score; IF: Impact factor; HI: H-Index.

Similar articles

References

    1. van Timmeren JE, Cester D, Tanadini-Lang S, Alkadhi H, Baessler B. Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection. Insights Imaging. 2020;11:91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, Sanduleanu S, Larue RTHM, Even AJG, Jochems A, van Wijk Y, Woodruff H, van Soest J, Lustberg T, Roelofs E, van Elmpt W, Dekker A, Mottaghy FM, Wildberger JE, Walsh S. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:749–762. - PubMed
    1. Lu C, Shiradkar R, Liu Z. Integrating pathomics with radiomics and genomics for cancer prognosis: A brief review. Chin J Cancer Res. 2021;33:563–573. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodalal Z, Trebeschi S, Nguyen-Kim TDL, Schats W, Beets-Tan R. Radiogenomics: bridging imaging and genomics. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019;44:1960–1984. - PubMed
    1. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2016;278:563–577. - PMC - PubMed