Differences in treatment response between female and male psoriatic arthritis patients during IL-12/23 therapy with or without methotrexate: post hoc analysis of results from the randomised MUST trial
- PMID: 38114198
- PMCID: PMC10749014
- DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003538
Differences in treatment response between female and male psoriatic arthritis patients during IL-12/23 therapy with or without methotrexate: post hoc analysis of results from the randomised MUST trial
Abstract
Background: The influence of sex on treatment outcomes during interleukin-12/23 therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has not been explored.
Objective: To conduct exploratory post hoc analyses of sex-stratified data from the MUST trial, an investigator-initiated, multicentre, phase 3b study in which patients with active PsA initiating treatment with open-label ustekinumab were randomised to treatment with placebo or methotrexate (MTX).
Methods: We evaluated baseline characteristics, key treatment outcomes and adverse events stratified by sex, with a focus on outcomes that did not include erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as a component due to the known elevation of ESR in females.
Results: A total of 166 patients were treated with ustekinumab+MTX (37 female, 50 male) or ustekinumab+placebo (32 female, 47 male). At baseline, females had a significantly longer time since PsA diagnosis and greater impairment in physical function, but similar joint counts. At week 24, both females and males showed marked improvements to ustekinumab with or without MTX. Females generally had numerically reduced treatment responses compared with males, although differences did not achieve statistical significance. MTX did not show an overall effect on treatment outcomes, but was associated with faster enthesitis responses in males only. Adverse events were generally comparable, but females in the ustekinumab+MTX group had higher levels of gastrointestinal disorders.
Conclusion: Females and males with PsA had differences in baseline characteristics, treatment responses and adverse events during therapy. A better understanding of sex-based differences in PsA may help optimise treatment.
Keywords: arthritis, psoriatic; biological therapy; epidemiology; methotrexate; treatment.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: MK received consulting fees or honoraria from Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis and UCB and received travel support from UCB. UK received grant and research support and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biocad, Biogen, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Gilead, Grünenthal, GSK, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, onkowissen.de, Pfizer, Roche, UCB and Viatris and participated on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for the COPAGO trial, conducted by the German Ministry of Health. GRB received fees or honoraria for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB, meeting or travel support from Abbvie and Lilly and is the editor-in-chief of RMD Open. DMK received honoraria for serving as a speaker for Sanofi-Aventis. SF received scientific grants from Novartis, honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Galapagos, Novartis, NovoNordisc and UCB, and travel or meeting support from Abbvie, Galapagos, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, SOBI and UCB. RB received honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, BMS, Chugai, GSK, Galapagos, Novartis, Roche and Vifor and meeting or travel support from Chugai and Galapagos. MS received research support from Charité. FB received research support for this study from Janssen Cilag, consulting fees or honoraria from Abbvie, Acelyrin, Amgen, Janssen Cilag, Lily, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, and meeting or travel support from Abbvie and UCB. ACF, TR, HK and JB have no competing interests to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Methotrexate plus ustekinumab versus ustekinumab monotherapy in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (MUST): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3b, non-inferiority trial.Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 Jan;5(1):e14-e23. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00329-0. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023. PMID: 38251504 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib by background methotrexate dose in psoriatic arthritis: post hoc exploratory analysis from two phase III trials.Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;41(2):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05894-2. Epub 2021 Sep 12. Clin Rheumatol. 2022. PMID: 34510295 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of ustekinumab in biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis by prior treatment exposure and disease duration: data from PSUMMIT 1 and PSUMMIT 2.RMD Open. 2019 Aug 18;5(2):e000990. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000990. eCollection 2019. RMD Open. 2019. PMID: 31565242 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ustekinumab: a review of its use in psoriatic arthritis.Drugs. 2014 Jun;74(9):1029-39. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0242-4. Drugs. 2014. PMID: 24919864 Review.
-
Methotrexate for treating rheumatoid arthritis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD000957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000957.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24916606 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous