Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 2:14:1260480.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260480. eCollection 2023.

Trust in relationships: a preliminary investigation of the influence of parental divorce, breakup experiences, adult attachment style, and close relationship beliefs on dyadic trust

Ceren D Yılmaz  1 , Timo Lajunen  2 , Mark J M Sullman  3
Affiliations

Trust in relationships: a preliminary investigation of the influence of parental divorce, breakup experiences, adult attachment style, and close relationship beliefs on dyadic trust

Ceren D Yılmaz et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Trust is essential for establishing stable and fulfilling romantic relationships between partners. Development of trust, however, can be assumed to depend on many factors related to an individual's earlier experiences and relationship-related beliefs. This study aimed to investigate how adult attachment style (anxious, avoidant), experiences about parents' divorce and breakdown of one's own romantic relationship, and relationship beliefs are related to the level of dyadic trust in romantic relationships.

Methods: The present study included 131 Turkish undergraduate university students (55.7% women) from different faculties. The research instrument had questions about parents' and respondents' own relationship status, Dyadic Trust Scale (DTS), Experiences in Close Relationships Inventory-Revised (ECR-R), and Inventory of Close Relationship Beliefs (ICRB), in addition to background questions. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, Pearson correlations, regression analyses and mediation analyses.

Results: Respondents whose parents had divorced or who had experienced a relationship breakdown had lower dyadic trust scores than those without these experiences. The trust scores correlated negatively with anxious and avoidant attachment styles and positively with relationship belief scales, although the correlations to "external factors" were not statistically significant. In regression analysis, anxious and avoidant attachment styles explained 42% and relationship beliefs 25% of the variance in trust. The only significant predictor among beliefs was "individuality." Mediation analysis showed that the effects of anxious attachment style on trust were fully mediated by the relationship belief in "individuality." The avoidant attachment style had a direct relationship to trust.

Discussion: The results show that anxious attachment style influences trust via relationship beliefs, while avoidant attachment style has a strong direct effect on trust as well as weaker effects via beliefs. The results are discussed in the context of Turkish culture and horizontal collectivism.

Keywords: attachment styles; close relationship beliefs; dyadic trust; mediation; romantic relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Attachment style, relationship beliefs, and dyadic trust: the mediation model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Ainsworth M. D. S. (1991). “Attachments and other affectional bonds across the life cycle,” in Attachment Across the Life Cycle, eds. C. M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, and P. Marris (London: Routledge; ), 33–51.
    1. Aron A., Paris M., Aron E. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 69, 1102–1112. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1102 - DOI
    1. Baldwin M., Keelan R., Fehr B., Enns V., Rangarajoo E. (1996). Social-cognitive conceptualisationconceptualisation of attachment working models: availability and accessibility effects. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 71, 94–109. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.94 - DOI
    1. Bao X., Li S., Zhang Y., Tang Q., Chen X. (2022). Different effects of anxiety and avoidance dimensions of attachment on interpersonal trust: A multilevel meta-analysis. J. Soc. Personal Relation. 39, 2069–2093. 10.1177/02654075221074387 - DOI
    1. Brennan K. A., Shaver P. R. (1995). Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21, 267–283. 10.1177/0146167295213008 - DOI

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

LinkOut - more resources