Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in People With Poststroke Gait Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 37947080
- PMCID: PMC10727274
- DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031532
Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in People With Poststroke Gait Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background The exercise strategy that yields the greatest improvement in both cardiorespiratory fitness () and walking capacity poststroke has not been determined. This study aimed to determine whether conventional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or high-intensity interval training (HIIT) have different effects on and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Methods and Results In this 24-week superiority trial, people with poststroke gait dysfunction were randomized to MICT (5 days/week) or HIIT (3 days/week with 2 days/week of MICT). MICT trained to target intensity at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold. HIIT trained at the maximal tolerable treadmill speed/grade using a novel program of 2 work-to-recovery protocols: 30:60 and 120:180 seconds. V̇O2 and heart rate was measured during performance of the exercise that was prescribed at 8 and 24 weeks for treatment fidelity. Main outcomes were change in and 6MWD. Assessors were blinded to the treatment group for but not 6MWD. Secondary outcomes were change in ventilatory anaerobic threshold, cognition, gait-economy, 10-meter gait-velocity, balance, stair-climb performance, strength, and quality-of-life. Among 47 participants randomized to either MICT (n=23) or HIIT (n=24) (mean age, 62±11 years; 81% men), 96% completed training. In intention-to-treat analysis, change in for MICT versus HIIT was 2.4±2.7 versus 5.7±3.1 mL·kg-1·min-1 (mean difference, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.5-4.8]; P<0.001), and change in 6MWD was 70.9±44.3 versus 83.4±53.6 m (mean difference, 12.5 [95% CI, -17 to 42]; P=0.401). HIIT had greater improvement in ventilatory anaerobic threshold (mean difference, 2.07 mL·kg-1·min-1 [95% CI, 0.59-3.6]; P=0.008). No other between-group differences were observed. During V̇O2 monitoring at 8 and 24 weeks, MICT reached 84±14% to 87±18% of while HIIT reached 101±22% to 112±14% of (during peak bouts). Conclusions HIIT resulted in more than a 2-fold greater and clinically important change in than MICT. Training to target (ventilatory anaerobic threshold) during MICT resulted in ~3 times the minimal clinically important difference in 6MWD, which was similar to HIIT. These findings show proof of concept that HIIT yields greater improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness than conventional MICT in appropriately screened individuals. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03006731.
Keywords: HIIT; aerobic exercise; cardiorespiratory fitness; hemiplegia; locomotion; stroke.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10727274/bin/JAH3-12-e031532-g002.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10727274/bin/JAH3-12-e031532-g001.gif)
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the effects of high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on inflammatory markers, cardiorespiratory fitness, and quality of life in breast cancer patients.J Sport Health Sci. 2023 Nov;12(6):674-689. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 8. J Sport Health Sci. 2023. PMID: 37423313 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of High-Intensity Interval vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 23;9:845225. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.845225. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35282360 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Physical Health in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Nov 18;8(11):158. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8110158. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021. PMID: 34821711 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Short-term and Long-term Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of High-Intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation: The FITR Heart Study Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;5(12):1382-1389. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3511. JAMA Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32876655 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on vascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2015 May;45(5):679-92. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0321-z. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 25771785 Review.
References
-
- Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng JJ, Franklin BA, Johnson CM, MacKay‐Lyons M, Macko RF, Mead GE, Roth EJ, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2532–2553. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022 - DOI - PubMed
-
- ACSM . American College of Sports Medicine's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 11th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020.
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous