Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 9;17(1):128.
doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00668-x.

Cognitive and affective control for adolescents in care versus their peers: implications for mental health

Rosie McGuire  1   2 , Sarah L Halligan  3   4 , Susanne Schweizer  5   6 , Jovita T Leung  7 , Rachel M Hiller  2   8
Affiliations

Cognitive and affective control for adolescents in care versus their peers: implications for mental health

Rosie McGuire et al. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. .

Abstract

Background: Many adolescents who have been removed from the care of their biological parent(s) and placed in State or Local Authority care have experienced significant adversity, including high rates of maltreatment and other trauma(s). As a group, these young people experience far higher rates of mental health difficulties compared to their peers. While their mental health outcomes are well-documented, little is known about mechanisms that may drive this. One potential mechanism, linked to both trauma and adversity exposure and mental health, is affective control (the application of cognitive control in affective contexts).

Methods: We compared cognitive and affective control in 71 adolescents (65% girls) in care aged 11-18 (M = 14.82, SD = 2.10) and 71 age and gender-matched peers aged 11-19 years (M = 14.75, SD = 1.95). We measured cognitive and affective control using standard experimental tasks, and for those in care, we also examined associations with self-reported emotion regulation, mental health, and school well-being.

Results: After controlling for IQ, there was a significant group difference in affective control performance, with those in care on average performing worse across all tasks. However, further analyses showed this was driven by deficits in overall cognitive control ability, and was not specific to, or worsened by, affective stimuli. Further, we found no evidence that either cognitive or affective control was associated with emotion regulation abilities or the mental health and well-being of young people in care.

Conclusions: Results suggest that cognitive and affective control may not underlie mental health for young people in care, though limitations should be considered. We discuss implications for theory and intervention development, and avenues for further research.

Trial registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QJVDA.

Keywords: Affective control; Care-experience; Emotion regulation; Mental health; Post-traumatic stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report that there are no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(2):217–237. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barceló F. The Madrid card sorting test (MCST): a task switching paradigm to study executive attention with event-related potentials. Brain Res Protoc. 2003;11(1):27–37. doi: 10.1016/S1385-299X(03)00013-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berridge D. Educating young people in care: what have we learned? Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34(6):1171–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.032. - DOI
    1. Blower A, Addo A, Hodgson J, Lamington L, Towlson K. Mental health of ‘looked after’children: a needs assessment. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;9(1):117–129. doi: 10.1177/1359104504039176. - DOI
    1. Bonanno GA, Burton CL. Regulatory flexibility: an individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013;8(6):591–612. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504116. - DOI - PubMed