Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 17:24:101540.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101540. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Inequities in colorectal and breast cancer screening: At the intersection of race/ethnicity, sexuality, and gender

Affiliations

Inequities in colorectal and breast cancer screening: At the intersection of race/ethnicity, sexuality, and gender

Emmeline Lin et al. SSM Popul Health. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the joint impact of sexual orientation, gender identity, and race/ethnicity on colorectal and breast cancer screening disparities in the United States.

Methods: Utilizing sampling weighted data from the 2016 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we assessed differences in two metrics via chi-square statistics: 1) lifetime uptake, and 2) up-to-date colorectal and breast cancer screening by sexual orientation and gender identity, within and across racial/ethnic classifications.

Results: Within specific races/ethnicities, lifetime CRC screening was higher among gay/lesbian (within NH-White, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander) and bisexual individuals (Hispanic) compared to straight individuals, and lowest overall among transgender women and transgender nonconforming populations (p < 0.05). Asian transgender women had the lowest lifetime CRC screening (13.0%; w.n. = 1,428). Lifetime breast cancer screening was lowest among the Hispanic bisexual population (86.6%; w.n. = 26,940) and Hispanic transgender nonconforming population (71.8%; w.n. = 739); within all races, SGM individuals (except NH-White, Hispanic, and Black bisexual populations, and NH-White transgender men) had greater breast cancer screening adherence compared to straight individuals.

Conclusions: Due to small, unweighted sample sizes, results should be interpreted with caution. Heterogeneity in screening participation by SGM status within and across racial/ethnic groups were observed, revealing the need to disaggregate data to account for intersecting identities and for studies with larger sample sizes to increase estimate reliability.

Keywords: Breast cancer screening; Colorectal cancer screening; Gender minority health; Intersectionality; Screening disparities; Sexual minority health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors of this article declare they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Colorectal and (B) breast cancer screening behaviors by SGM and racial/ethnic categories separately. Weighted n's (w.n.) are reported.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Colorectal cancer screening behavior, (A) Lifetime and (B) Up-to-date, according to sexual orientation and race (Asian includes Pacific Islander). Complete n's, weighted n's (w.n.), and 95% confidence intervals are found in Suppl. Tables S1a and S1b.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Colorectal cancer screening behavior, (A) Lifetime and (B) Up-to-date, according to gender identity and race (Asian includes Pacific Islander). Complete n's, weighted n's (w.n.), and 95% confidence intervals are found in Suppl. Tables S2a and S2b.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Breast cancer screening behavior, (A) Lifetime and (B) Up-to-date, according to sexual orientation and race (Asian includes Pacific Islander). Complete n's, weighted n's (w.n.), and 95% confidence intervals are found in Suppl. Tables S3a and S3b.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Breast cancer screening behavior, (A) Lifetime and (B) Up-to-date, according to gender identity and race (Asian includes Pacific Islander). Complete n's, weighted n's (w.n.), and 95% confidence intervals are found in Suppl. Tables S4a and S4b.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackerson K., Gretebeck K. Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2007;19(11):591. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00268.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agénor M., Pérez A.E., Tabaac A.R., Bond K.T., Charlton B.M., Bowen D.J., Austin S.B. Sexual orientation identity disparities in mammography among white, Black, and Latina U.S. Women. LGBT Health. 2020;7(6):312–320. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Austin S.B., Pazaris M.J., Nichols L.P., Bowen D., Wei E.K., Spiegelman D. An examination of sexual orientation group patterns in mammographic and colorectal screening in a cohort of U.S. women. Cancer Causes & Control. 2013;24(3):539–547. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-9991-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett N., Wholihan D. Providing palliative care to LGBTQ patients. Nursing Clinics. 2016;51(3):501–511. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2016.05.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bazzi A.R., Whorms D.S., King D.S., Potter J. Adherence to mammography screening guidelines among transgender persons and sexual minority women. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(11):2356–2358. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302851. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources